MikeHimself
Member
- Nov 17, 2024
- 34
Hammer House of Horror if you go back as far as the 1980s
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] West ham and Potter
- Thread starter andy_lee007uk
- Start date
Yep. I don’t believe he should be here because he’s a conspiracy theorist and massive anti semite.
Let’s be clear, he & I will debate each other on football but no one’s winning the internet with whether coach A is better than coach B or if a 20 yard inverted run by a fullback was to draw a centre midfielder.
But I would have thought someone living in a country that’s about to be plunged into darkness by a couple of conspiracy theorists could see how limiting that stuff on NSC might be beneficial.
Even if you can’t, he was told to knock that stuff off by his biggest mod supporter and didn’t, shitting all over a kind and hard fought concession he was given.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,834
If I am reading this right, disagreeing with HS and engaging in a discussion could well be seen as goading him. To my mind he gives as good as he gets in this regard.
So if we are to engage in discussion with him we be careful not to upset the delicate genius and goad him into displaying his, well call it his dark side.
I think I will take the Kosh option also and not bother to interact with the delicate genius, for fear of awakening the anti Semite within (something which apparently he needs to take little responsibility for).
Last edited:
cjd
Well-known member
How is your " How to be a ****, course like "Guiness Boy" going ?
I am far from being alone in this question .
- Oct 20, 2022
- 7,773
End of thread.
At least the part that is all about HS.
It’s a shame the thread has been so badly derailed - I for one will enjoy keeping a slightly sardonic eye on how Potter gets on at West Ham so hopefully this will get back on track.
cjd
Well-known member
I'm nowhere near your standard I'm afraid.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,688
cjd
Well-known member
No, just Guinness Boy in particular who is unfit for purpose.
I am far from alone in this opinion.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,688
cjd
Well-known member
It appears so, yes.
Unfortunately, even though one particular Moderator is clearly, unfit for purpose, other moderators consider it essential to support him.
Just one of those things unfortunately.
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
This was just what it was like in 'The Spy Who Loved Me' when they realised Stromberg was a bad Swede too. Roger Moore kept the British end up though at the end and I think that's what needs to happen here too.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,688
Te-te-tell you what, tell you what, it’s nine and a half thousand bans. I’m afraid the atmosphere has turned rrrrrrather sour
He made racial trope comments.
Not the first person here to do that. In 2009 some far right posters did the same.
Updated: North Stand Chat reopens its messageboards
UPDATE: A rowdy Brighton and Hove Albion internet forum which closed temporarily after being warned by the police has now reopened.www.theargus.co.uk
In both cases it led to permanent bans and posts deleted.
The problem is that when we start censoring what people say it doesn't change anyone's mind it just covers it over and like silage, it festers, unseen and unchallenged. We are in a very scary moment in history where all that festering nastiness is breaking through. The far right is making massive gains in Italy, France and now Germany. Trump has just been elected with a massive mandate to terrorise the most impoverished section of US society. A lot of this is a push back against the so-called "progressives" and their program of censorship and ex-communication of anyone who doesn't share their worldview.
Since the inception of messaging boards, threads have always gone off on tangents.
Sounds like we think similarly on that.
But posts about the Rothchilds and Jewish racial traits in general (not Israel btw) left @Bozza and the mods with little legal choice. NSC by internet standards is a sewer free zone.