Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[News] Southport Murderer Pleads Guilty



P

PascalGroß Tips

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2024
827
I'm watching the updates on Sky News. It's the most traumatic and horrifying I've heard in a very long time ... maybe forever. Impossible to imagine what the parents, families and friends of those involved must be going through. Sarah-Jane Mee is understandably struggling herself reading out the impact statements.

I'm sure the tariff handed down will be a very big number ... but whatever that number is, it won't be enough. And as for his behaviour in court today ...
 






dazzer6666

dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
56,468
Burgess Hill
PascalGroß Tips said:
I'm watching the updates on Sky News. It's the most traumatic and horrifying I've heard in a very long time ... maybe forever. Impossible to imagine what the parents, families and friends of those involved must be going through. Sarah-Jane Mee is understandably struggling herself reading out the impact statements.

I'm sure the tariff handed down will be a very big number ... but whatever that number is, it won't be enough. And as for his behaviour in court today ...
Click to expand...
Tried reading the statements but finding it too difficult TBH.
 








R

ROSM

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
7,085
Just far enough away from LDC
Tom Hark Preston Park said:
What purpose exactly does is serve to keep that **** alive?
Click to expand...
None whatsoever. however we live in a civilised society and stooping to his standards doesn't send out the right messages or drive the right behaviour. It's a painful situation especially for the survivors and the victims' families
 


Uncle Spielberg

Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,327
Lancing
I am leaning to the death penalty for some crimes in this country now him and that piece of filth from a month ago
 
Last edited:


jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,654
I think we all agree this piece of shit would be better served dead. But I am vehemently anti-death penalty because just one innocently executed person is one too many. And there have been hundreds, or thousands, when the death penalty was imposed.

But yes, in this specific case with the nature of this offence, it’s entirely understandable to want him dead.

I won’t be shedding a tear if he gets his in prison - which is a real possibility.
 




dazzer6666

dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
56,468
Burgess Hill
jcdenton08 said:
I think we all agree this piece of shit would be better served dead. But I am vehemently anti-death penalty because just one innocently executed person is one too many. And there have been hundreds, or thousands, when the death penalty was imposed.

But yes, in this specific case with the nature of this offence, it’s entirely understandable to want him dead.

I won’t be shedding a tear if he gets his in prison - which is a real possibility.
Click to expand...
Agree but he’ll probably be safer in prison (where he’ll be in solitary) than if/when he gets out.
 


N

nevergoagain

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2005
1,695
nowhere near Burgess Hill
Uncle Spielberg said:
I am leaning to the death penalty for some crimes in his country now him and that piece of filth from a month ago
Click to expand...
Absolutely, there are crimes where there is absolutely no question of guilt, this being one, Lee Rigby killers, Fred West etc. and IMO they forfeit their right to life and it serves no purpose whatsoever to keep them alive. Listening to the judge now is very upsetting.
 


K

Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,833
hassocks
jcdenton08 said:
I think we all agree this piece of shit would be better served dead. But I am vehemently anti-death penalty because just one innocently executed person is one too many. And there have been hundreds, or thousands, when the death penalty was imposed.

But yes, in this specific case with the nature of this offence, it’s entirely understandable to want him dead.

I won’t be shedding a tear if he gets his in prison - which is a real possibility.
Click to expand...

Armed police taking him out would have also been an acceptable outcome to this scumbag
 




GJN1

GJN1

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2014
1,598
Brighton
"The defendant was 17 at the time of the offences, nine days short of his birthday.

The judge clarifies that had he been 18, he would have been compelled to pass a sentence of life imprisonment without a minimum term.

The law does not permit that for under 18s however."

I sense a problem coming up...
 




GJN1

GJN1

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2014
1,598
Brighton
GJN1 said:
"The defendant was 17 at the time of the offences, nine days short of his birthday.

The judge clarifies that had he been 18, he would have been compelled to pass a sentence of life imprisonment without a minimum term.

The law does not permit that for under 18s however."

I sense a problem coming up...
Click to expand...
52 years.
 






D

Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,297
GJN1 said:
"The defendant was 17 at the time of the offences, nine days short of his birthday.

The judge clarifies that had he been 18, he would have been compelled to pass a sentence of life imprisonment without a minimum term.

The law does not permit that for under 18s however."

I sense a problem coming up...
Click to expand...
Minimum 52 years. He’ll never get out regardless of what the minimum tariff is.
 


dazzer6666

dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
56,468
Burgess Hill
GJN1 said:
"The defendant was 17 at the time of the offences, nine days short of his birthday.

The judge clarifies that had he been 18, he would have been compelled to pass a sentence of life imprisonment without a minimum term.

The law does not permit that for under 18s however."

I sense a problem coming up...
Click to expand...
Judge has done a pretty good job of sentencing him to just about the maximum he could, and made it clear he wasn’t expecting him to be released.
 






M

Milano

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2012
4,145
Sussex but not by the sea
Minimum term of 52 years, is this judge on f***ing crack? Should be 152 years. There should be absolutely zero chance of this **** getting out, ever. He would only be 70. Those families need to know 100% that he's never leaving prison. This sentance doesn't deliver that.
 




You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here