I think that's a generous description.Another occasional wicket keeper.
He may or may not have his own pair of wicketkeeper gloves.
I think that's a generous description.Another occasional wicket keeper.
True.Might be different if we had Wood available or somebody of that ilk who offers something particularly different, but I'm not sure a few overs of 80ish mph seam bowling would achieve much in this situation.
I don't think Pakistan bowled a single over with a seamer did they?
Since a handful of fruitless overs from Jamal at the start of the last Test, they've been bowling spinners for approx the last 150 oversMight be different if we had Wood available or somebody of that ilk who offers something particularly different, but I'm not sure a few overs of 80ish mph seam bowling would achieve much in this situation.
I don't think Pakistan bowled a single over with a seamer did they?
Smith missed the chance - but he also single-handedly kept England's hopes of winning the Test alive, with a brilliant counter-attacking innings.Just to hopefully put the wicket keeper thing to bed. Smith dropped a straight forward chance off Saud when he was on 26. He now has a big ton now. I don't think Foakes would have missed that.
Is the lad Rew at Somerset not supposed to be the next big wicket-keeping hope?I think that's a generous description.
He may or may not have his own pair of wicketkeeper gloves.
Have to disagree with the RtHon member there. He did indeed play a splendid innings but, over the long term, the value of those extra 10 runs an innings is far outweighed by missed chances, byes and, like the village attempt that was missed in the last Test, stumpings.Smith missed the chance - but he also single-handedly kept England's hopes of winning the Test alive, with a brilliant counter-attacking innings.
Unless you are absolutely confident that Foakes could have done the same, then it really doesn't put anything to bed!
Let's be clear - I am very much on the same page as you on the 'specialist keeper v middle order batter with some old keeper gloves' debate.Have to disagree with the RtHon member there. He did indeed play a splendid innings but, over the long term, the value of those extra 10 runs an innings is far outweighed by missed chances, byes and, like the village attempt that was missed in the last Test, stumpings.
I've heard about him, but he's notably younger than Smith and Cox and only averaged mid 30s with the bat last season, so I can see why they're not throwing him in straightaway. For comparison, Cox averaged 65 and scored 4 hundreds to Rew's 2.Is the lad Rew at Somerset not supposed to be the next big wicket-keeping hope?
He’s on the young Lions tour this winter with, among others, Rocky FlintoffIs the lad Rew at Somerset not supposed to be the next big wicket-keeping hope?