maffew
Well-known member
Dear Mayor, London got a bit safer already with this gangster taken out and his other cronies locked up in jail cos of the Met.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[News] Chris Kaba .. Justice served ?
- Thread starter Questions
- Start date
Ike and Tina Burner
Well-known member
- Mar 22, 2019
- 644
The press showing a young, smiling man who was about to be the father of a child. In fact he had received a Domestic Violence Protection Order preventing him from contacting the mother-to-be.
Soton Seagull
Well-known member
Sounds like he was a scumbag, although I struggle with the idea that people deserve to die for being such things.
That said, trying to run over the police, particularly if they have guns, does seem naive at best.
That said, trying to run over the police, particularly if they have guns, does seem naive at best.
Ike and Tina Burner
Well-known member
- Mar 22, 2019
- 644
Out of the last 10 unlawful killings of police officers 4 were caused by a motor vehicles. 3 by cars and one by a quad bike. Your comment is outrageously ignorant.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
My final response to you on this thread because you are clearly on a wind up, or are CATASTROPHICALLY stupid. I mean seriously highly enriched weapons grade buffoonery.
For the most part this has been an interesting and considered debate on this thread. Except for your tiresome childish nonsensical gubbins, which sticks out like a turd on a snare drum.
Yes they were
He was driving a car which had been involved in an armed incident. Are you seriously suggesting the police shouldn't want to question the driver of such a car? And then when they did try to question him, he rammed them. Repeatedly.
And you think that's doing nothing wrong.
I've been stopped by the police a lot of times. I've always complied with their instructions.
No, the situation was caused by the fact that the vehicle had been used in an armed incident.
No, they thought he might be armed because (is the penny dropping yet?) the vehicle had been used in an armed incident.
Of course it is, which is why people are sometimes guilty of causing death by dangerous driving.
Have you ever, ever, been right about anything?
Should be banned. Is a totally pointless user who just talks shit on every subject for the sake of it.
Don't worry about the pr*t - there's a reason his user name includes 'Nob'.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,019
In fairness, I always try to give people the benefit of the doubt. I had a falling out with someone here many years ago, who it turned out was going through some very serious and sad stuff in their personal life and were perhaps not being “their best self” when presenting on NSC.
Giving this poster the benefit of the doubt, he may be having mental issues we don’t know about or be sleep deprived etc.
Giving this poster the benefit of the doubt, he may be having mental issues we don’t know about or be sleep deprived etc.
METALMICKY
Well-known member
- Jan 30, 2004
- 6,940
Always the same false narrative isn't it? He loved his mum and helps old ladies across the road with their shopping. When in reality turns out they are weapons grade career violent criminals!
Yes. I wasn't referring to that article in the Guardian. I expect it also had some football scores in; I wasn't referring to those, or the sports pages either. I was referring to the article linked in the OP. Forgive me for thinking that your reply looks a little dense.
Thanks to the CPS prosecuting, it probably has ruined his life. Feral ratboy's nice little chums have the honour of their gang to protect, innit, and any policeman who shoots their leader is dissing all of them so revenge is the only justice. It is quite possible the victim in this (the policeman who did his job and has been found not guilty) may have to go into police protection.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Yes, sadly I fear you may be right.
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,968
This one should have never have got to court, but until the MET sorts itself out there will always an element of doubt I'm afraid.
There is wide distrust of the MET. Far too many scandals and their historical inability to deal with it.
dsr-burnley
Well-known member
- Aug 15, 2014
- 2,683
When he says "London's communities", he really needs to explain what he means. He needs to make it absolutely clear that he is talking only about communities of gangsters and criminals, and not (for example) black people in general.
I salute your indefatigability.
Agree. It had to go to court.
And not all Met police acts are criminal acts, as on this occasion.
One might argue that both the dead man, and the Met brought it all on themselves.
One would hope that large amounts of money will be spent protecting and compensating this police officer, whose safety has been compromised by the needless naming of him before conviction. Oh, hang on, sorry, before acquittal. I suspect I have just unearthed the flaw in due process here....
Have you actually read anything about this case?
Randy McNob
> > > > > > Cardiff > > > > >
- Jun 13, 2020
- 4,732
The point i'm making is there seems to be no distinction between whether the pursuit and use of firearms was due to the belief they thought he had a gun in his posession and would have used it - and the fact they felt his car was the leathal weapon. Seems like the car reason was brought into the equation only once they realised he was unarmed. Maybe justice would have been served with a manslaughter charge