Yes, and as Kurt Volker said to the BBC "that's war".Guess the problem is there will always be the odd one which goes astray.
Yes, and as Kurt Volker said to the BBC "that's war".Guess the problem is there will always be the odd one which goes astray.
He is selling it, but it's mostly only those that see only state TV that are buying it. If it's open knowledge that the US is allowing its weapons to strike inside Russia, it will be easier to sway the rest.
That’s a good point - why let Putin know what the West has decided? Let him sweat and find out if / when it happens.I'm wondering if there may be a bit of smoke and mirrors surrounding this delay in making an announcement.
For instance, there may be value in giving Ukraine permission, but not announcing it, and leaving Putin to wonder about it. This action could save Ukrainian lives.
NATO could do a Putin, and do the opposite of what they are expected to do. But if we announce it, it firms up and becomes official, and Putin could use it for his faux outrage.
It is possible that just the prospect of western missiles hitting Russia, but not actually pulling the lever, may act as a sufficient deterrent. OK, it's unlikely, but it might be worth a pop. A bit like the Kerch bridge maybe. The prospect of the bridge being destroyed may be of more value than actually destroying it.
A problem for most of Russia's missiles as they say they never target civilians !!Guess the problem is there will always be the odd one which goes astray.
Budanov interview:
Fwiw, I didn't think Russia's economy had that long to go.
BOOM!
We can only hope this is true? Not sure how Kyiv based journalist would know it, but here's hoping.
Debris from an intercepted UAV, according to the local authorities. Impressive cook-off going on in the background
Debris from an intercepted UAV, according to the local authorities. Impressive cook-off going on in the background
Here's a big dose of potential positivity.
Yes. I guessed that's self produced?Was that 3 million drones this year for Ukraine?