Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,101


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
Very poor on the lack of a youth mobility scheme, a betrayal of young people but I'm not surprised. So can't have a summer job in Majorca, but can work in Melbourne..

My daughter had always wanted to travel round Europe and do a ski season when she was growing up, but that was all taken away from her. She ended up spending 18 months in Oz, it's totally and utterly ridiculous :mad:
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,599
Deepest, darkest Sussex


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,600
Gods country fortnightly
My daughter had always wanted to travel round Europe and do a ski season when she was growing up, but that was all taken away from her. She ended up spending 18 months in Oz, it's totally and utterly ridiculous :mad:
So far all we've seen out of the Australian arrangement is a brain drain of our health workers, trust me Lizz Truss's £500k private jet was all worth it
 


Mental Lental

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
2,300
Shiki-shi, Saitama
I see the new government have postponed the border checks on incoming fruit and veg until July 2025.


I wonder how long it will be before this government can start to begin to suggest that maybe, just maybe, Brexit was a bit of a shit idea in the first place?
 


Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,370
Worthing




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
They seem petrified to go there

Probably because it will hammer inflation on all imported foodstuffs and another round of border delays, when and if yet another aspect Brexit actually gets 'done' (again :lolol:). It's the reason the last Government delayed implementing it five times.

As Rees-Mogg famously said implementing the Brexit deal that was actually negotiated 'would be an act of self harm'. It's why no government wants to do it :shrug:
 


Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,370
Worthing
Probably because it will hammer inflation on all imported foodstuffs when and if Brexit actually gets 'done' (again :lolol:)

As Rees-Mogg famously said implementing the Brexit deal that was actually negotiated 'would be an act of self harm'. It's why no government wants to do it :shrug:
By going there I was more referring to discussing 'fixing' Brexit (i.e. not doing it). As their version involves making it work, we have to be prepared for many more years of econonic drag and issues with travel.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,277
Faversham
They seem petrified to go there

Mainstream Tory thinking (I mean all their leadership candidates) is that Brexit has been a success.
Even plenty of Labour supporters think it would be 'wrong' to have another referendum.
The current labour government cannot 'go' there all the while so many people think Brexit is the Will of the People
It would be billed as the greatest betrayal of the British People since Kim Philby.

The only way out of this mess is to wait till making deals that are apparently 'forbidden' by the will of the people become 'ideas whose time has come'.

And it will be a very hard sell to restore relatively 'free trade' in exchange to re-signing agreement for our goods to conform with EU regulations, for example.

We said 'no' to square eggs, straight bananas and Polish plumbers, right?

And as for free movement of EU citizens to work, driven by economic need and unfilled vacancies, we didn't vote leave just to 'open up our borders' again! The country would be overrun with asylum seekers, all fast tracked into council houses.

(I was a remainer and agree that Brexit was a massive avoidable act of self harm.
But I can't expect Starmer to throw the Labour party onto the sharp upturned pikes of the massed ranks of the Will of the People.
Who in the media could resist a binfest? The Mail, Sun, GBeebies, and even the BBC (in the interests of balance) would be all over it.
And the streets would be full of 'patriots', rioting to save our country).

Less dystopian views may be available, but they would be, in my opinion, a tough sell right now.
 




Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,186
Probably because it will hammer inflation on all imported foodstuffs and another round of border delays, when and if yet another aspect Brexit actually gets 'done' (again :lolol:). It's the reason the last Government delayed implementing it five times.

As Rees-Mogg famously said implementing the Brexit deal that was actually negotiated 'would be an act of self harm'. It's why no government wants to do it :shrug:

Wait. Hang on a minute.

If we are now choosing not to implement the controls that we wanted to implement by 'taking back control', then what was the point of Brexit?

To take back control but not actually control anything?
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
Wait. Hang on a minute.

If we are now choosing not to implement the controls that we wanted to implement by 'taking back control', then what was the point of Brexit?

To take back control but not actually control anything?

Maybe it was to take back control of immigr ............. oh :dunce:
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,277
Faversham
Wait. Hang on a minute.

If we are now choosing not to implement the controls that we wanted to implement by 'taking back control', then what was the point of Brexit?

To take back control but not actually control anything?
Come on.

The referendum was to shut up the 'bastards' (tory back bench wankas like Bill Cash) once and for all.

The plan was for 'remain' to win. That was 'call me Dave's' plan.

There was no plan by the leavers. They just wanted to leave.

The absurd promises (£350 million a day for the NHS etc.) were made simply to nudge the sheep (electorate) to put the X in the Leave box.

Signing off the last acts of self harm was kicked down the road by Johnson, Truss and Sunk.

It makes sense for Starmer to do the same till we reach a point where a stark choice is needed, whence Starmer can say 'this is madness, we need a fix'.

As there is no fix apart from re-creating some of the arrangements we had before we left, this will be the moment where it all kicks off again.
 




nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,600
Gods country fortnightly
I see the new government have postponed the border checks on incoming fruit and veg until July 2025.


I wonder how long it will be before this government can start to begin to suggest that maybe, just maybe, Brexit was a bit of a shit idea in the first place?
So because the Brexit sunny uplands haven't arrived for the economy we STILL can't afford the cost proper customs checks on EU imports?

That said I guess this mean the EU isn't doing the same for our exports? That would be unfair....
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,186
Maybe it was to take back control of immigr ............. oh :dunce:
So the sole purpose of Brexit was to take back control of immigration? Nothing else?

Time for a pole. (Unfortunately he's gone back to Poland), so we'll have to wait for the results).

Has Brexit been a success? (Success being measured in lower numbers of immigrants)

a. No.
b. No.
c. Possibly, if you wanted to control the numbers of immigrants upwards.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
Last polling May 24

987347-blank-355.png


Of those who gave a positive or negative response

64% thought we were wrong to leave
36% thought we were right to leave

I wonder at what point it can be addressed ???
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
So because the Brexit sunny uplands haven't arrived for the economy we STILL can't afford the cost proper customs checks on EU imports?

That said I guess this mean the EU isn't doing the same for our exports? That would be unfair....

And certainly not from day 1 of Brexit :facepalm:

Still it's balanced out by all those trade deals with the major economies of the world USA, China, India ................. oh :dunce:
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,600
Gods country fortnightly
And certainly not from day 1 of Brexit :facepalm:

Still it's balanced out by all those trade deals with the major economies of the world USA, China, India ................. oh :dunce:
They were ready with checks on our imports on day 1 of Brexit. They were ready
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Wait. Hang on a minute.

If we are now choosing not to implement the controls that we wanted to implement by 'taking back control', then what was the point of Brexit?

To take back control but not actually control anything?
De regulation of rights, so the rich can make more and more profits especially in Special Enterprise Zones, where there will be no regulation. See P&O.
 


mwrpoole

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
1,519
Sevenoaks
Last polling May 24

987347-blank-355.png


Of those who gave a positive or negative response

64% thought we were wrong to leave
36% thought we were right to leave

I wonder at what point it can be addressed ???
Unfortunately for the 64%, charging VAT on education is outlawed in the EU so Labour would have to u-turn that policy which I'm guessing is unlikely. Freeports are also an issue but I really don't know much about them.
 




nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,600
Gods country fortnightly
So the sole purpose of Brexit was to take back control of immigration? Nothing else?

Time for a pole. (Unfortunately he's gone back to Poland), so we'll have to wait for the results).

Has Brexit been a success? (Success being measured in lower numbers of immigrants)

a. No.
b. No.
c. Possibly, if you wanted to control the numbers of immigrants upwards.
It really is quite a feat that Brexit managed to drive up immigration, create a labour shortage and stagnate economic growth all at the same time.

What would have happened to the economy if we really had cut immigration as promised?
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,792
Unfortunately for the 64%, charging VAT on education is outlawed in the EU so Labour would have to u-turn that policy which I'm guessing is unlikely. Freeports are also an issue but I really don't know much about them.

I think the £1.3B that would be raised by VAT on education pales into insignificance compared to the £100B pa leaving the customs union has cost us in GDP, and I would imagine any chancellor would think exactly the same. (Ok, maybe not Kwasi :laugh: )

I don't know what you mean when you say 'freeports are also an issue', Britain has had them pre and post Brexit :shrug:
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here