Dan Gleeballs
Active member
- Nov 24, 2011
- 968
Again agree with this. Would this be happening if, for instense Mick McCarthy (no disrespect) was in charge.. Erm no
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Would Razak Sign???
- Thread starter Sibroadway
- Start date
Again agree with this. Would this be happening if, for instense Mick McCarthy (no disrespect) was in charge.. Erm no
Buckley's Chance
Buckley's love child
It'd be absolutely amazing if he did, or if we could get a season long deal for him next season. He could get us to the playoffs this season!
felbridgeseagull
New member
dream on!
nomoremithras4me
Active member
- Apr 7, 2011
- 2,348
The Geezer is talented no doubt. If City don't want him there will be a queue of about 20 clubs that would take Raz IMO. Maybe, just maybe if we went up then possibly a small chance. Just goes to show having a great stadium, great manager, great fan support & a great supportive Chairman, the type of players we can attract.
Try reading it again.
Ah, so that's why he's here on loan. Toure is bloody sick of him.
Exactly why I imagine he's worth so much.
Worthai Seagull
Wenners
Erm......some of our development players are maybe older than Rasak ...amazing talent !
Worthai Seagull
Wenners
Not condescending at all.... what you say is right , and we could all see today what training with world class players does for you....especially if you WANT to learn ! An exceptional talent, which we can enjoy for the rest of this season . Hopefully some of our midfielders can learn from this BOY !! Amazing .
Mutts Nuts
New member
- Oct 30, 2011
- 4,918
So are liverpool...they can't even score their own goals
I still don`t get it we score 4 they score 3 and win how the fcuk does that work,f***ing scousers can even steel a result
City
New member
Cheers mate.
By the way, what role does he play for your team? Central midfielder or attacking midfielder? I know he is great at both.
Mutts Nuts
New member
- Oct 30, 2011
- 4,918
Yeah that was hilarious, I was like "Who tries to do a overhead kick in their own box?", guy next to me, "Abdul Razak does.". And we both looked back at him and nodded wisely.
I wouldn't go too mad and compare him now with proven great midfield dominators but he certainly looks like he could be as good.
Barn Door Billy
New member
BBC Sport - Football - Manchester City
The only reason that Razak is not on the list is because he is a youth player and they do not have to be in the top 25.
Quite a lot of competition for a first team place at City. If we get to the Premier, we will need four players of his quality. Central defender, Keeper and striker.
Maybe David Pizarro will sign permanently for Manchester City?
The only reason that Razak is not on the list is because he is a youth player and they do not have to be in the top 25.
Quite a lot of competition for a first team place at City. If we get to the Premier, we will need four players of his quality. Central defender, Keeper and striker.
Maybe David Pizarro will sign permanently for Manchester City?
Last edited:
City
New member
Who would you buy though. I think good ball playing midfielders and left backs are the hardest players to find these days. Just my opinion, though.
Also mate, what position does Abdul play for your lot? Central midfield or attacking midfield?
Didn't go to Hell midweek, but yesterday he had a pretty free, proper central midfield role, our other midfielders Navarro and Reyes were more defensive and Barnes plays just behind and around our striker. So their great play gave him the freedom to do it though. He didn't get level with the forwards often and he didn't drop back into defense if one of them went up the field. I don't mean to compare him to other names in term of skills but more of position - so a position more similar to Viera than Makélelé.
Really good at holding the ball, can stand up and not get knocked off the ball by challenges he turns his back to and other pushes and shoves from behind or the side. Great going forward and making accurate passes to either wing from the centre of the pitch, on the deck or over the top. Didn't let himself get dragged out of that role and position very often at all either, so pretty impressive discipline overall for a young player as well.
Really good at holding the ball, can stand up and not get knocked off the ball by challenges he turns his back to and other pushes and shoves from behind or the side. Great going forward and making accurate passes to either wing from the centre of the pitch, on the deck or over the top. Didn't let himself get dragged out of that role and position very often at all either, so pretty impressive discipline overall for a young player as well.
Shooting Star
Well-known member
No. But let's just use the loan to our benefit; City have such depth that hopefully he won't be getting into the first team for a while, so just keep him on loan for as long as possible.
Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
Because of the way Gus has made us play making our team attractive for like minded players who like to play the passing game and not the West Ham style of game
Another Berkshire Seagull
Well-known member
of course we have a chance...it wasn't that long ago this kid was at Palace and they couldn't even see the potential in him to pay for his paperwork to get him signed to play. The amounts touted on here for him are riddiculous.
We need to make the kid feel as if he's loved in Brighton (like we did with Lua Lua)...then the pull will be too strong to resist.
We need to make the kid feel as if he's loved in Brighton (like we did with Lua Lua)...then the pull will be too strong to resist.
JOLovegrove
Well-known member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 2,037
Because he is good?