Trufflehound
Re-enfranchised
Re: Milkins Out
What's young Perry ever done to upset you?
What's young Perry ever done to upset you?
Gullsworth said:Point taken mate but i would rather have a manager who does'nt come across as genuine and saves us from oblivion than a lovely bloke with nice teeth who takes us to the conference!
Mouldy Boots said:How would he save us from oblivion mate he left this side of boys and players that have seen better days.
Remember this is Mcghee's team
Icy Gull said:6 from 31 hardly makes it McGhee's team, it's whoever decided to sign 10 youth teamers team isn't it?
haven't we already had this argument today?
Icy Gull said:
Oh and don't worry MM couldn't spend the money we do have so there should be a big pile left for Deano to spend
But why do you keep saying that? The facts do not bear that out.Rougvie said:but it all came to an end because the fans (which are needed to make Falmer a reality) were starting to vote with their feet
Mouldy Boots said:How would he save us from oblivion mate he left this side of boys and players that have seen better days.
Remember this is Mcghee's team apart from the big loss of Reidy and the new players Williams and Whing, who will need time to settle in but Williams has a goal and Whing looked to be up to it considering he was playing with a team that weren't playing as a team(you know what i mean).
Get behind wilkins mate and get off thar Fence
Icy Gull said:6 from 31 hardly makes it McGhee's team, it's whoever decided to sign 10 youth teamers team isn't it?
haven't we already had this argument today?
Oh and don't worry MM couldn't spend the money we do have so there should be a big pile left for Deano to spend
Sid James said:Yes, it's the I've supported them longer than you argument. Not entirely unexpected, that one.
Mouldy Boots said:What MM only gave out 6 contracts in 3 years.
Are you including all his signing etc?
Ps we probably have had this disscussion before but it is always good to have it twice for an accurate assessment!
London Irish said:But why do you keep saying that? The facts do not bear that out.
We actually had higher attendances this season post relegation under McGhee than we had under Coppell last time we fell to League 1. The drop in STs was about 700, completely to be expected when you go from Championship to League 1.
We started this season with excellent crowds of 6.6k rising to 6.7k. Even the late-Sunday switch Crewe attendance of 5.8k was decent given the amount of floating fans that would have decided to spend their money at Lords the previous day.
What has happened since the McGhee sacking? Our Saturday crowds have absolutely plunged.
If there was any truth in what you say about fans staying away because of McGhee, wouldn't they have immediately have returned buoyed by the gteat news for a few games at least?
The reality is - those stayaway fans sensed the truth of the sacking, it was an attempt by the board to lower expectations of the vast majority of fans in what we could achieve this season. Of course they deserted in huge numbers, they could see the game was up for any play-off chance we had as soon as McGhee went.
Uncle Buck said:The reason those 2 gates were higher than under Coppell at the beginning of the 2003/04 season, simple, there are more tickets available.
London Irish said:The reality is - those stayaway fans sensed the truth of the sacking, it was an attempt by the board to lower expectations of the vast majority of fans in what we could achieve this season.
Of course they deserted in huge numbers, they could see the game was up for any play-off chance we had as soon as McGhee went. They won't be coming back any time soon either.
London Irish said:That's right, McGhee was able to get more people to part with their money to buy those extra tickets! So much for the fans voting with their feet then!
But they certainly are now that people like you got their way with McGhee's sacking - bravo
Gullsworth said:You in your own words mate have said you expected a manager of the ilk of McGee would be pushing for a promotion place and mid table would be a failure
I am saying a rookie manager in this position will take us down and maybe worse than relegation from this division! I have never doubted Wilkins ability as a youth coach but if the pressure got to MM and he was making mistakes what will it do to a manager with little or no experience like Wilkins ..............If he turns it around i will be as pleased as you but i think he is not ready for the pressure................you know i will support him come what may even if we went as far as the conference unlike your stance over McGee
THERE I AM OFF THAT f***ing FENCE!!!! .......
Uncle Spielberg said:We are in this position because D blockers forced McGhee out. I was against McGhee getting the sack and against Wilkins replacing him. That is not secret but don't try and make out that I am somehow against the club I love because I think Wilkins should be given help working as a no 2 with a proven manager.
Rougvie said:
Only someone with terminal leaning difficulties would fail to notice that McGhee had lost the majority of the supporters (although by no means all), I actually think that if he hadn't used the media to blame other people then he would still be in charge as it was the mans personality and the way he went about his business that sealed his fate in the end.