D
No, and neither was my rudeness to you the other day, I apologise for that.
Why mention it today ? Just because it's Good Friday ? Actually there's rarely much need for profanity or blasphemy. I think the real irony are the number of people who blaspheme
but who are in fact atheists. BTW, did you know that use of the words 'Bloody' and 'Bleeding' are blasphemous ? They refer to Christ's blood. (I love telling 'Good' Christians that when they use those words).
No it isn't. To say that someone is bleeding does not refer to Christ's blood and it doesn't matter where the word originated.BTW, did you know that use of the words 'Bloody' and 'Bleeding' are blasphemous ? They refer to Christ's blood.
Profanity is often not a sign of limited vocabulary. The brightest people still swear. Stephen Fry was discussing this on QI not long ago, giving his point of view that swearing isn't a sign of limited vocabulary.Blasphemy, like profanity, is often a sign of a limited vocabulary.
The use of uncommon long words isn't always necessary, but like swearing, they can add something to a sentance to make it more interesting.Therefore, in response to your question, "is it necessary?", the answer would appear to be "no".
You'll note I said "often" a sign of limited vocabulary. Not always.
A prick in the hands of Pinter is pure gold.