He said he wanted his shoes. Several times. Some time after it was confirmed that the shooter was down, and the fight was over, he shouted fight fight fight.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] The 2024 US Election - Trump v Harris
- Thread starter Zeberdi
- Start date
He said he wanted his shoes. Several times. Some time after it was confirmed that the shooter was down, and the fight was over, he shouted fight fight fight.
Maybe it was an alternative to being scared out of his pants as it would leave him less open to ridicule if he had been literally and publicly scared out of his pants. So instead he went for being scared out of his shoes.
US Seagull
Well-known member
It wouldn't surprise me if he wore his shoes a size bigger than necessary just out of ego. He has to have the bigglest shoes.
Plus you know what they say about men with small feet.
- Oct 17, 2008
- 12,898
Most likely it’s lifts in the heels.
AZ Gull
@SeagullsAcademy Threads: @bhafcacademy
This is America, so it's elevators.
To paraphrase Lady Bracknell in Oscar Wilde's "The Importance of Being Ernest"... To lose one shoe might be considered unfortunate, to lose both shoes just looks like carelessness....
Hopefully by November we'll be saying the same about elections..... To lose one election might be considered unfortunate, to lose two elections.....
He’s been “Truthing” that Harris got where she is by giving blowjobs. If I’ve understood the story correctly.
Now, in my book, revolting libel like that should result in immediate disqualification from the presidential race.
If you can’t play the game nicely, you don’t get to play at all.
Now, in my book, revolting libel like that should result in immediate disqualification from the presidential race.
If you can’t play the game nicely, you don’t get to play at all.
You'd think he'd have the sense and self awareness to steer well clear of using sexual smears to attack his opponents given his own legally established history
Quite
Trump takes sexist Harris attacks to ‘whole other level’ on Truth Social
Republican strategists irritated as ex-president posts another lewd reference to his presidential rival online
www.theguardian.com
They left because they were stitched up by the DNC establishment.
Thats one hell of a "holding the line" argument.
Your arguments never make any sense. Let's compare how many Republicans have said they'll vote for Harris/Walz to the 3 people, mostly crazy ex-Dems, you stated are for Trump. Got anymore?
Not a narcissist like him.
Besides, being a vile misogynist, he'll assume that his sundry sexual assaults and misdemeanors are OK because he's a man (and he can boast about them as 'locker-room bantz'), whereas any alleged sexual misdemeanors, however minor and fully consensual, by a woman should disqualify her as morally unfit to hold public office.
The old 'stud/slut' double-standard which Neanderthals like Trump probably still believe.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,888
it shouldn't even need him to be disqualified, it should be enough for voters to to turn their back on him.
Having said, that the guy's character has been exposed so many times in beggars belief that he still has a chance and people are still prepared to back him.
I suppose, like the couple on here, Trump supporters have to turn a blind eye as this part of his campaign cannot be justified.
It's a bit late for that
There should have been enough over the last 8 years for voters to turn away from him. It's so difficult to get your head around why any decent person would vote for him.
- Oct 20, 2022
- 6,034
- Thread starter
- #5,097
‘Exclusive: Harris widens lead over Trump, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 29 (Reuters) - Democrat Kamala Harris leads Republican Donald Trump 45% to 41% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Thursday …
The 4 percentage point advantage among registered voters was wider than a 1 point lead Harris held over the former president in a late July Reuters/Ipsos poll. The new poll, which was conducted in the eight days ended Wednesday and had a 2 percentage point margin of error, showed Harris picking up support among women and Hispanics.’
In key battleground swing states (which are likely to decide the overall winner) where the 2020 election was closest - Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina, Michigan and Nevada - Trump had a 45% to 43% lead over Harris among registered voters in the poll.
However, a ‘separate Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll published later on Thursday showed that Harris was either leading or tied with Trump in each of those states.
That poll showed Harris led Trump by 2 percentage points among registered voters across the seven states and was ahead by 1 point — a statistical tie — among likely voters. The margin of error was 1 percentage point across the seven states.’
FiveThirtyEight polls show Harris ahead or tied in Georgia, Mich, Penn and Nevada and trailing by 1% in NC and Wisconsin:
In a Wall Street Journal poll, Harris leads Trump
Harris led Trump 47%-45% if third-party candidates were included or 48%-47% head-to-head in a Wall Street Journal poll released Thursday, marking the first time in over a year Trump has trailed in a Journal survey—a reversal from Trump’s 49%-47% head-to-head edge a month ago (the poll surveyed registered voters from Aug. 24-28, margin of error 2.5 points).
Trump Vs. Harris 2024 Polls: Harris Takes First-Ever Lead In WSJ Survey
Most polls indicate a tight race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, with Harris taking a slight lead.
www.forbes.com
TL;DR
While the November Election still too close to call with both Trump and Harris more or less neck and neck in battleground states (with Harris either tied or ahead), Harris continues to gain ground and amongst registered voters nationally is marginally ahead of Trump in nationwide polls as much as 4% ahead in some of the most recent polling.
The worrying thing is he usually accuses others of things he himself has done.
Which means….
Crawley Dingo
Political thread tourist.
- Mar 31, 2022
- 853
RFK was Lawfare and sabotage. Gabbard had her debate interview removed from CNN for starters
Tulsi Gabbard vs. the DNC: her complaint about debate exclusion, explained
Gabbard argues, unconvincingly, that the DNC’s process for winnowing the debate field lacked “transparency.”
www.vox.com
and the rest you can google..
Crawley Dingo
Political thread tourist.
- Mar 31, 2022
- 853
This has been explained. If I'm getting 3 responses or more for every post, I am not going to reply to al of them with citations and links to a bunch of bad faith actors who have NEVER conceded one point(Zeberdi the exception i think). My time is valuable to me and I have the same level of contempt for most posters on these threads as they do for me. If in doubt google it yourself.