Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
Never in 33 years have I heard that.
Maybe the big eared boys on farms in rural sussex use it?
Maybe the big eared boys on farms in rural sussex use it?
Dave the Gaffer said:....only if people believe those facts Jim.
Biscuit said:Surely facts are facts because there backed up with solid evidence. Therefore making them irrefutable.
Believe whoever you like, but the facts speak for themselves.
And I've never heard that stupid saying either!
Gwylan said:That's pure nonsense. pretty much everyone from Sussex will know the phrase "We wun't be druv" - I first learned it when I was a little child.
It's scarcely obscure: I remember Julie Burchill using it in a column a few years back - if it were known to only a few people, who did a newcomer from London pick it up?
I thought it was a great phrase for the campaign: typically Sussex and described our feelings perfectly.
Biscuit said:I oppose his cock-and-bull stories because they are crapulous.
Dave the Gaffer said:where did you plagurise that from
Easy 10 said:Far be it for me to criticise as so far the campaign has been brilliant, but I wasn't particularly impressed with that leaflet to be honest. When we're trying to get a clear message across, having the phrase "WE WUN'T BE DRUV" as the main title just had me wondering "well what the f does THAT mean then ?".
Archaic sussex dialect is all well and good, but when only a handful of people in the county have ever heard of it (and there was no explanation as to its meaning - you had to buy a match programme to find a definition of it tucked away somewhere), I can't help feeling it was a bit too smarty-pants for its own good.
I'm not suggesting AT ALL that you have any sort of "hidden agenda", Dave, just that I sometimes find the carping about aspects of the Falmer campaign somewhat irritating. Harty does it a lot.Dave the Gaffer said:To suggest I have somesort of hidden agenda is frankly nonsence
This really is a stale argument, isn't it?jazzy said:There was a definition at the bottom of the leaflet - but in very small letters.
jazzy said:There was a definition at the bottom of the leaflet - but in very small letters.
This really is a stale argument, isn't it?
The leaflet succeeded. It got massive numbers of people along to the rally.
Lord Bracknell said:I'm not suggesting AT ALL that you have any sort of "hidden agenda", Dave, just that I sometimes find the carping about aspects of the Falmer campaign somewhat irritating. Harty does it a lot.
Actually that's where you're wrong. If you could, metaphorically speaking, sit LDC down and get it pissed it would tell you that frankly it hasn't got a leg to stand on and that its case is based on lies and pedantry. They don't want the stadium. Period. They are prepared to do anything to string out the legal challenge for as long as possible. They don't really expect to win (although they might) but the longer it goes on there more chance there is of the Albion going bust or of fan unrest causing a boardroop coup to unseat DK. In that case they are hoping he'll be replaced by someone who will utter the words that will ultimately kill our club: "I think perhaps it's time we looked at a Plan B. Re-develop Withdean perhaps?"Dave the Gaffer said:...
Its a game of posturing on both sides. We all know our case is right, LDC and its supporters know their case is right.