Safeway
M0DERAT0R
Did you know that 100% of all non-smokers die.
Safeway said:Did you know that 100% of all non-smokers die.
Safeway said:Did you know that 100% of all non-smokers die.
graz126 said:not much differance between smoking and not then is there. apart from the cost of the damn things. so the obvious advantage to non smokers is the amount of tax we pay for them. and they still have the audacity to moan about us.
Safeway said:Did you know that 100% of all non-smokers die.
Beach Hut said:Another wonderful fact from the Teflon boy
El Presidente said:But smokers DO cost the economy money.
Studies have been done, and show that the increased cost to the Health Service, invaildity benefit costs, days lost from work, and reduction in productivity from fag breaks more than offsets the revenue raised from taxes on cigarettes, and the savings to the exchequer from paying pensions for a shorter period of time to smokers.
Barrel of Fun said:You would be hard pushed to find a selection of pubs in Brighton that is smoke free. Why should you not have a choice of venue, because smokers smoke the pub out?
This law is good and it is a shame that the Govt. don't have the balls to push it forward sooner.
looney said:Couldn't give a shit. I'll do as I please, f*** you.
dougdeep said:I don't care about the effects on the economy, and I don't care about the cancer risks, I just want to breathe fresh air.
cjd said:Why are you indoors on your computer...? Get out in the garden if you like fresh air so much...!
graz126 said:he died of lung cancer yes. where is the proof it was passive smoking that was the cause of this? did he grow up in a industrial town. or next to a main road.
TonyW said:Perfectly legal pass time.
If you don't want smoke in your face.
f*** off to another seat.
graz126 said:not ALL the experts agree with that either. a doctor in america has been campaigning to stop all this scare monger tactics set up by anti smoking groups. and found very suprising results. something like 10 out of a thousand people he surveyed in america thought passive smoke was not too much of a health risk. the same survey in england was put to 100 people, something like 90% said passive smoke can be a health risk.
looks like the anti smoking campaign in england is going really well.
i personally think there is a health risk from passive smoke but not as bad as people make out. at no point have i actually said there isnt a slight risk.
Nemesis said:
* Smoking near children is a cause of serious respiratory illnesses such as bronchitis and pneumonia.
* Secondhand smoke increases the risk of getting asthma and causes asthma attacks. And younger children are much more likely to contract a serious respiratory infection that requires hospitalisation.