Believe me I know Kuipers has weaknesses, they all do. I'm not on my high horse and I'm certainly not blinded.. If they're good, they're good, if they're shit, they're shit. Kuipers has been one of the best players this season (out of two - him & Forster) and I find it irritatting that people cannot recognise it because they themselves choose to just see his 'weaknesses'
I am not sure anyone has said that he hasnt had a good season and I agree that he had a great shout for the MOM today.
But your if they're good they're good or if they're shit they are shit gives it away.
At what stage does your view become good or shit and once made are you likely to change that view even if a players form might change ?
I reckon that once you have made your judgement you will back it to the hilt irrespective of how they might be playing on a match day and wont accept another opinion on that player.
Some supporters appreciate different attributes in a player and that is why some dont share your views on who should be considered the best at the club.