cannedheat
Banned
Iceland doing fine? The country that nearly went bankrupt?
And which is so happy with life outside the EU that it applied to join the European Union in July this year.
But they eat cats in the EU pickled boiled and grilled.
Iceland doing fine? The country that nearly went bankrupt?
And which is so happy with life outside the EU that it applied to join the European Union in July this year.
It's good to see "Dave" Cameron clinging on to the remote prospect of running an anti-Europe referendum in the UK by now putting pressure on the Czech president not to ratify the Lisbon treaty before a UK general election is held.
Make your mind up, Dave. Do you want to run this country? Or are you happy to hand over the key decision to Prague?
The UK parliament has already ratified the Lisbon treaty. Do its decisions count for NOTHING in Cameron's mind?He wants the Czechs and Poles to stall to buy time, he wants a referendum for Great Britain. Labour will put pressure on them to ratify because they are shit scared of giving us the vote.
The UK parliament has already ratified the Lisbon treaty. Do its decisions count for NOTHING in Cameron's mind?
They dont count. No parliament is beholden to a previous government especially laws that were passed against a manifesto pledge.
It has no moral standing, the tories can and probably will rip it up and hold a referendum.
One of the reasons for voting YES to the Lisbon treaty is that it extends the 'opt-out' rights of member states.Ah but you over look a third option. Using the immoral action as levarage to get an opt out vis the social chapter.
The European Commission is unelected, each member state appoints a commissioner.
Six, 600 or 6,000 - it doesn't matter. Some of them didn't 'bottle it' and give up. And guess what - quite a few 'Bogtrotters' (as you put in an ealier post) fought for Britain during World War one and two. Remove your head from your arse and try to engage one of your two brain cells.
There is of course a very good reason why the EU is undemocratic - it would never work otherwise. That's partly what the Treaty has been about to remove national vetoes and to bring in majority voting so that the entire process can be streamlined without awkward nations like Britain derailing everything...
And at no point since 1975 have we, Britain, had any say in this, to repeat, slow suffocation of democracy.
Ah but you over look a third option. Using the immoral action as levarage to get an opt out vis the social chapter.
And fourth. That the tories will use it as an excuse to propell the UK out of the EU.
As for the Pro-EU wing of the party, I would not call them intelligent by a longshot, in my experiance make up about 5% of tory members.
It has always been a splinter group rather than a split.
God preserve us from flyweight ex public schoolboys endorsed by the "Sun"
Like Blair?
... and THAT is precisely the problem with a referendum. It would turn into a beauty contest between political leaders ... which is a RIDICULOUS way to determine the future of the United Kingdom's place in Europe.
We have a representative democracy in the UK. We let parliament decide these matters. And we accept the result. If a later parliament wants to change things, the mechanisms to do so are in place. Politicians who "demand a referendum" are simply copping out of their responsibilities.
The docu-drama "When Boris Met Dave" will be shown on More 4 on Wednesday 7 October. It will be a good watch about their shared past at Eton and Oxford where they were both members of the elite society the Bullingdon Club. It will give an insight into their unsuitability for high office.