non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct
I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.
non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct
What defence, exactly? I'm going to guess that you don't even know what the legal defences are to criminal damage, so how can you say that?
I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.
I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.
You can but very unlikely.
You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.
this is just a SMEAR CAMPAIGNnjm
This is of course ignoring any possible employment issues where upon conviction the clubs chances would be increased if it was a person employed by the club.
You can't. You can be sued but not prosecuted.
non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct
You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.
Getting through that game though, meant a game where the winner gets £140m!
You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.
So how can they prove who do it?
Seriously if someone said Mr X did it, is it serious enough for them to take a DNA sample and match it up?
Would they have even kept a sample, and if so, how could they prove that was the poo in question, as I would be pretty sure it would have been cleaned up straight away, and not by the police, making it null and void as evidence.
You can depending on the trespass