legal beagles?

[Driver8]

non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct

I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Attempt to manufacture a replica of a Palace player.

 

[Mr Hankey]

Well shucks, I didn't know I was in so much trouble, I only wanted to be friends. Now the poolice are involved?
your all a bunch of stool pigeons.
Howdyhoooo

 

[BensGrandad]

What defence, exactly? I'm going to guess that you don't even know what the legal defences are to criminal damage, so how can you say that?

You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.

 

[PILTDOWN MAN]

I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.

You can but very unlikely.

 

[timbha]

I don't think you can be prosecuted for trespass.

you could well be right, unless of course it is a particular type of trespass......"squatting" maybe!!!

 

[dougdeep]

You can but very unlikely.

You can't. You can be sued but not prosecuted.

 

[BensGrandad]

njm

You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.

This is of course ignoring any possible employment issues where upon conviction the clubs chances would be increased if it was a person employed by the club.

 

[Neil]

njm

This is of course ignoring any possible employment issues where upon conviction the clubs chances would be increased if it was a person employed by the club.

this is just a SMEAR CAMPAIGN

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Ruff justice

 

[PILTDOWN MAN]

You can't. You can be sued but not prosecuted.

You can depending on the trespass

 

[TheJasperCo]

non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct

Well I don't know about any of that, but it is gross.

 

[Bob!]

You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.

Getting through that game though, meant a game where the winner gets £140m!

 

[Danny-Boy]

If the offender is sent to prison will they put him on Holloway?

 

[BensGrandad]

Getting through that game though, meant a game where the winner gets £140m!

There would be no proof that it affected the result of the game only hearsay.

 

[Da Man Clay]

You are right I dont but being a layman I wouldn't be too perturbed if I was charged with that and would expect my solicitor to fight the charge based on the dictionary definition of damage and that no damage was caused. Reading the CPS site it appears that criminal damage comes in two levels either under or over £5000 so in this case the amount of damage would be negligible so hardly worth pursuing the issue.

They'd be found guilty. Cost involved with the clearing of such an incident would be sufficient to prove damage had been caused. Almost zero chane of a custodial sentence though.

 

[Tubby-McFat-Fuc]

So how can they prove who do it?

Seriously if someone said Mr X did it, is it serious enough for them to take a DNA sample and match it up?

Would they have even kept a sample, and if so, how could they prove that was the poo in question, as I would be pretty sure it would have been cleaned up straight away, and not by the police, making it null and void as evidence.

 

[Napper]

So how can they prove who do it?

Seriously if someone said Mr X did it, is it serious enough for them to take a DNA sample and match it up?

Would they have even kept a sample, and if so, how could they prove that was the poo in question, as I would be pretty sure it would have been cleaned up straight away, and not by the police, making it null and void as evidence.

Swipe card entries on the door system could help

 

[Brighton TID]

Surely the poo can be analysed, and say if they found tuna they could match this to credit card receipts from Dick's Bar, voila, anyone who had the tuna baguette for lunch (allowing for digestion time) is obviously GUILTY.
Or they could check the security swipe cards.

 

[dougdeep]

You can depending on the trespass

No you can't. It's a civil offence.