The Large One
Who's Next?
Charlies, Shinpad, I was merely pointed out the futility of your argument in directly comparing Dean Wilkins' achievements with Stuart Pearce's.
Wilkins does indeed have many of the credentials of being a fine coach. I would have no problem if Deano became our manager one day. It's just that the timing - so many people talking about it being now - would be utterly pointless. Dick Knight has the man in charge he believes will make the team and club a genuine force.
To explain, I am looking at the bigger picture here, much bigger than relegation (though not as big as Falmer).
Notwithstanding the fact that McGhee is not going to be sacked, nor is he likely to resign, speculation on a successor is kind of pointless because McGhee is, for the first time, building his own squad for the future. Unfortunately, there looks to be a price to pay, which is the real threat of relegation, because he cannot finish building this team in time for this relegation fight.
Wilkins has a role in this squad-building, and that is to nurture the youth team along. He has done a fantastic job with that set-up, so what purpose would be served by taking away the main ingredient of a winning combination? The club isn't only about the first-team, it's about a solid structure from top to bottom, including what Wilkins (and Hinshelwood) is doing now.
Is relegation a price worth paying? Some on here obviously say 'no, stay in the Championship at all costs', and while it is not the policy or intention to go down, I believe it will not be the unmitigated disaster many think it could be.
Even Micky Adams had the luxury of taking one and a half seasons to build his squad before he started a title-winning season. We hardly really noticed because we were in such a pisspoor position to start with. He took his time and spent in excess of £200,00 doing it.
Wilkins does indeed have many of the credentials of being a fine coach. I would have no problem if Deano became our manager one day. It's just that the timing - so many people talking about it being now - would be utterly pointless. Dick Knight has the man in charge he believes will make the team and club a genuine force.
To explain, I am looking at the bigger picture here, much bigger than relegation (though not as big as Falmer).
Notwithstanding the fact that McGhee is not going to be sacked, nor is he likely to resign, speculation on a successor is kind of pointless because McGhee is, for the first time, building his own squad for the future. Unfortunately, there looks to be a price to pay, which is the real threat of relegation, because he cannot finish building this team in time for this relegation fight.
Wilkins has a role in this squad-building, and that is to nurture the youth team along. He has done a fantastic job with that set-up, so what purpose would be served by taking away the main ingredient of a winning combination? The club isn't only about the first-team, it's about a solid structure from top to bottom, including what Wilkins (and Hinshelwood) is doing now.
Is relegation a price worth paying? Some on here obviously say 'no, stay in the Championship at all costs', and while it is not the policy or intention to go down, I believe it will not be the unmitigated disaster many think it could be.
Even Micky Adams had the luxury of taking one and a half seasons to build his squad before he started a title-winning season. We hardly really noticed because we were in such a pisspoor position to start with. He took his time and spent in excess of £200,00 doing it.