Glenn Murray in talks with Norwich City......

[hans kraay fan club]

Keep it up? Do behave. What, so I'm not allowed to be abusive to Palace fans? So you're going to ban yet another BHAFC fan for telling a palace fan to f*** off? How many Palace fans get banned from BSS for abusing BHAFC fans? NONE. How many BHAFC fans get banned from BSS for abuse? %100. Get a life. You are so sad it's unbelievable.

I've never banned anyone for being abusive to Palace fans. I've banned people for being consistently abusive in general, though - Palace, Albion or otherwise.

I don't give a toss what is or isn't allowed on the BBS. That has nothing to do with what is or is not accepted on here.

 

[BensGrandad]

Isnt it time this thread was closed; due to the abuse from both directions

 

[FinchleyEagle]

Thank f*** for that, now do one you stinky palace pikey stench laden unwashed tax invading scummer.

BB you have some serious anger issues. You could quite easily have an argument in an empty room. And in all probability you are right now.

 

[Bigbelly]

I've never banned anyone for being abusive to Palace fans

But you indicated that a ban could be on the cards.

.

I've banned people for being consistently abusive in general, though - Palace, Albion or otherwise

But I've only been abusing Palace fans. Read above ^

I don't give a toss what is or isn't allowed on the BBS. That has nothing to do with what is or is not accepted on here.

But you you're saying it's ok to be abusive to Palace fans. Read quote one ^

 

[GingerBeerMan]

Ta ta Judas. Cheerio Winifried.

Palace mid table.

Lovely jubbly.

That's how you deal with the Palace.

 

[Dougie]

Stinky palace pikey stench laden unwashed tax invading scummers and their possible transfer to the sister coupling 6 fingered tossers

Do keep up!

Not forgetting bigbellys unorthodox chatting up technique .

 

[Horses Arse]

Not forgetting bigbellys unorthodox chatting up technique .

What was unorthadox about it?

 

[hans kraay fan club]

But you're said indecated that a ban could be on the cards.

. But I've only been abusing Palace fans. Read above ^

But you you're saying it's ok to be abusive to Palace fans. Read quote one ^

No, it's quite simple. If you are consistently aggressive and abusive you will pick up infractions.

 

[Acker79]

I love January (is that spelt correctly? Someone on another thread earlier suggested the only reason I'm not banned is because of my atrocious spelling)

Sure, she's attractive, but by accounts not really much of a personality

 

[EDS]

But your freighting me with a ban

Freighting= the hauling of freight

Threatening= causing alarm, as by being imminent; ominous; sinister

And you talk about the schools in Croydon lol

 

[Bigbelly]

No, it's quite simple. If you are consistently aggressive and abusive you will pick up infractions.

lol, What against Palace fans? yeah right, it wouldn't suprice me in the slightest. Palace are game for abuse and if they don't like it then I suggest they f*** off somewhere else and not post on here, this isn't an OAP tea party convention.

 

[Psychobilly freakout]

Freighting= the hauling of freight

Threatening= causing alarm, as by being imminent; ominous; sinister

And you talk about the schools in Croydon lol

I must say it is a tad embarrassing, we are all not quiet as bed at spilling as Bigcock

 

[hans kraay fan club]

lol, What against Palace fans? yeah right, it wouldn't suprice me in the slightest. Palace are game for abuse and if they don't like it then I suggest they f*** off somewhere else and not post on here, this isn't an OAP tea party convention.

No. I'm sorry but you have the rules very wrong. This site relies heavily on the income from GoogleAds. Abusive content and extreme language contravene Google's rules, for the sites they are prepared to be associated with.

If you are constantly aggressive, abusive or profane, then you risk losing the funding of NSC. Who you are abusing is irrelevant - Google's software won't care. [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] has asked the moderators to be vigilant on this issue. that is how it is. If you do not agree with these rules, then post elsewhere.

 

[Bigbelly]

I must say it is a tad embarrassing, we are not quiet as bed at spilling as Bigcock

I'll be watching you posts and will show your errors

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

No. I'm sorry but you have the rules very wrong. This site relies heavily on the income from GoogleAds. Abusive content and extreme language contravene Google's rules, for the sites they are prepared to be associated with.

If you are constantly aggressive, abusive or profane, then you risk losing the funding of NSC. Who you are abusing is irrelevant - Google's software won't care. [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] has asked the moderators to be vigilant on this issue. that is how it is. If you do not agree with these rules, then post elsewhere.

And don't for f***'s sake make flippant gags about Patrick Moore! RIP

 

[Psychobilly freakout]

I'll be watching you posts and will show your errors

Fine fella I make plenty, enjoy yourself

 

[hans kraay fan club]

And don't for f***'s sake make flippant gags about Patrick Moore! RIP

I think flippant gags are okay.

Scurrilous allegations, less so.

 

[Philzo-93]

aren't the sun and the times owned by the same person/people? Surely the star has got to be worse than the sun. Also broadsheets are less likely to print speculation until they are pretty sure of it

Yeah but that doesn't mean they print the same stuff though. And I said The Sun was one of the worst newspapers for sport speculation.

 

[Bigbelly]

I've never banned anyone for being abusive to Palace fans.

So is that ok or not? YES/NO

If you are constantly aggressive, abusive or profane, then you risk losing the funding of NSC. Who you are abusing is irrelevant - Google's software won't care.

But I'm not apart from Palace fans. Whats it to be Hans?

 

[TSB]

Bigbelly-been great having you on ignore. Has improved my NSC experience no end. Thanks for being just that little too tedious.