Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Favourite Conspiracy Theories.
- Thread starter Eric Potts
- Start date
porkypie
On the road to no where
That liam dickinson is a striker!
The Raoul Moat siege.
After it had just happened it was widely believed that it was a massive conspiracy on the David Icke forum. We are all brainwashed and head-bangers on there.
After it had just happened it was widely believed that it was a massive conspiracy on the David Icke forum. We are all brainwashed and head-bangers on there.
The Merry Prankster
Pactum serva
Prince Philip had Diana murdered.
Benny Seagull
Active member
as far as i'm concerned this is no longer a theory. the evidence is out there and some serious questions need to be answered about 9/11. the tragedy is that people need to have a common enemy to keep their society together.
open your eyes, people.
Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!
Primary data is fact
That Martin Perry has deliberately delayed the entire Falmer project in order to line his own pocket without anyone noticing, except some bloke from Crowborough who has/had a "mate" who used to work for Camelot.
Was not Was
Loitering with intent
- Jul 31, 2003
- 1,598
That climate change is a conspiracy cooked up by academics chasing research grants, funded by the vested interests of the mighty loft-insulation industry, against the barely-resourced oil and fossil fuel companies.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
... only because she had discovered that the royal family were, in truth, alien reptiles.
Well look who Charles married after that - she doesn't even bother to hide it.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,826
i like lots of them, they are grat entertainment. so many to choose. cant think of a "favorite" though the JFK seems to be the best one as a genuine case of, really who was behind it all? neither the official, conspiracies or counter conspiracies add up.
doesnt make sence. why not move the CIA files else where? why not shread, burn or otherwise dispose. i think the actual conspiracy you refere to is that WTC7 was used as a command center for the operation. why place the command center so close? pre-supposes it was used to "trigger" the detonation of the towers. unnecessary as a) assumes detonation for which there is no evidence (except a single window blowing out) b) detonation could have been done by radio remote control.
good one. but based i recall on the testomony of one irish dock worker who liked to tell a tale for a guiness.
comical. why?
But we know that the climate change scientist twisted and misrepresented data. and that they rely on their being problems and queestion around climate change to get their funding for further research. we also know that climate models are flawed and inaccurate. they cannot project the next weeks weather accurately yet can apparently project to decades? im not saying there isnt a man made impact to global climate, but the system is so complex that a 0.01 change to one number in a computer model changes the whole picture, so the whole thing is tenuous. personally though, i rather be on the save side a bet on them being right and taking measures.
doesnt make sence. why not move the CIA files else where? why not shread, burn or otherwise dispose. i think the actual conspiracy you refere to is that WTC7 was used as a command center for the operation. why place the command center so close? pre-supposes it was used to "trigger" the detonation of the towers. unnecessary as a) assumes detonation for which there is no evidence (except a single window blowing out) b) detonation could have been done by radio remote control.
good one. but based i recall on the testomony of one irish dock worker who liked to tell a tale for a guiness.
comical. why?
But we know that the climate change scientist twisted and misrepresented data. and that they rely on their being problems and queestion around climate change to get their funding for further research. we also know that climate models are flawed and inaccurate. they cannot project the next weeks weather accurately yet can apparently project to decades? im not saying there isnt a man made impact to global climate, but the system is so complex that a 0.01 change to one number in a computer model changes the whole picture, so the whole thing is tenuous. personally though, i rather be on the save side a bet on them being right and taking measures.
Leicester Seagull
New member
- Oct 24, 2009
- 218
BeepBeepImaJeep
Farewell and adieu....
Never heard that one before. Made for some interesting reading here: Titanic alternative theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
cheers !
Was not Was
Loitering with intent
- Jul 31, 2003
- 1,598
Think about it - this is a 'conspiracy' thread so just focus on that. Is it even remotely credible that for a bit of research funding, scientists would contrive a theory whose implications challenge the basis of the global economy, and against which nearly all the powerful vested interests in the world are aligned? That really is as likely as Prince Philip getting Lady Di killed.
The 9/11 Bush government planned it all......... don't make me laugh.
How many hundreds if not thousands of people would it have taken to realistically planned, carried out and then plausibly denied that they any involvement in all of the events that day. Agreed some questions remain about that day...but no way was planned by Bush!!!....Do you really think he's clever enough
How many hundreds if not thousands of people would it have taken to realistically planned, carried out and then plausibly denied that they any involvement in all of the events that day. Agreed some questions remain about that day...but no way was planned by Bush!!!....Do you really think he's clever enough
The Merry Prankster
Pactum serva
It was alleged that El Fayed believed she was pregnant by his son and that the monarchy would not allow a dusky Arab Muslim child to taint the Royal Family.
Benny Seagull
Active member
The 9/11 Bush government planned it all......... don't make me laugh.
How many hundreds if not thousands of people would it have taken to realistically planned, carried out and then plausibly denied that they any involvement in all of the events that day. Agreed some questions remain about that day...but no way was planned by Bush!!!....Do you really think he's clever enough
have you seen the first in this series of films at http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/?
i'm not saying it's the truth but it brings up a lot of interesting questions.
The 9/11 Bush government planned it all......... don't make me laugh.
How many hundreds if not thousands of people would it have taken to realistically planned, carried out and then plausibly denied that they any involvement in all of the events that day. Agreed some questions remain about that day...but no way was planned by Bush!!!....Do you really think he's clever enough
Like you say he was far too stupid to have planned it. That said someone did and it clearly didn't take the 100's or 1000's that you suggest.
Sir Ian Blair actually told me the identity of Jack the Ripper. I proptly forgot, the name. I seem to remember it was a bloke - an immigrant who spent his latter days in a mental asylum. The Met have the details in their library, which is not accessable to the general public.