drew
Drew
The ironic thing in all this religous bashing is that the MAJORITY of ALL child abuse takes place in the family home (We studied this in 1st year of uni-sorry i haven't got a link to the evidence cos i'm at work) . But i won't let that evidence get in the way of you bashing the church over one twat from 1950.
Like BHA Express i am not a practising catholic (lapsed, what ever you wanna call it, in fact i'm proably more secular than catholic). I'm not sure if he has totally washed his hands of the religion, i can't remember what he said. Any way i'm divulging. Alot of my family and loved ones are devout catholics so that's why i'll always jump to it's defence. Everyone to do with the church are gutted about all this, and any cover ups should be exposed and those guilty brought to justice. But this thread and these media stories have detracted from the good things that come from the church and now the whole thing has become a vilification on the church as a whole.
I think you're missing the point. I don't believe people on here are bashing catholics. I was educated at a catholic school and send my daughter to one and have no reason to suspect any of the teachers. The criticism is entirely against the hierachy of the church who, in my view, are worse than the perpertrators. The paedophiles are sick and perverted and probably can justify their actions to themselves. However, the church leaders that protected them knew they were wrong but instead of protecting the weak and vulnerable, they exacerbated their suffering by, in effect, turning a blind eye.
And let's be honest, it's not the first scandal to hit the catholic church (or many others before you get all defensive). Look at the conspiracy theories that followed the death of Pope John Paul in 1978 and the subsequent revelations about corruption in the Vatican Bank.