NMH
Banned
Porky said:
Bill Clinton was virtually impeached out of office for getting a blow job, but if you say he's a wonderful man, then yes he is. He is probably responsible for less disorder and death, did more than anyone to try and make some order possible in Israel/Palestine. Does the fact that GWBush is such a freakin' idiot make him compare better? He's religious....so he declares a 'crusade' to attack other people of another religion? Otherwise why call it a 'crusade' before you say "bring it on" and send other people's kids to their deaths?
Yes I realised you didn't mean you think he's wonderful - but double standards are also there in every figurehead.
Some people judge Anna Nicole because she was a prostitute. That's what they call women who use their genitals in exchange for money.
Whatever she was up to, her profile was certainly not squeeky clean - more like a fine example of the worst in gold-digging, sueing, money-grabbing and sleeping around sleazyness. Any chance she may have committed adultery in her chequered career?
What standards can anyone have, if nobody can look at it that way?
Would you want, say, your daughter holding her up as an icon?
The Kennedys had Hitler's mate for a father. A man who despised The British yet supported Adolph.
JFK screwed around, apparently. Very likely that he nipped in for a quickie with Marilyn Monroe in a confused and alcohol-addled period of her life.
By raising comparisons, the list goes on and on..... until....maybe it might lead right on down the line to ....you?
What standards can anyone hold up as an example in this life - the only proof here is that you cannot expect ANY celebrity to uphold a perfect example for chaste values - no Jimmy Swaggarts or Jim Bakkers.
Mother Teresa, Florence Nightingale, maybe.
However, a celebrated user of her body to f*** film-stars, marry an uber-wealthy old prune, and shake her tits for the camera is not someone I want to regard as celebrated, personally.
? 
