[Politics] 2020 US election - Joe Biden vs Donald Trump

[Igzilla]

Nah can't see any Elvis or Loch Ness Monster on my recommendations, please share the link?

If anyone can find such a thing, I'm sure you can. You have such a talent for dredging up the unbelievable

 

[Bold Seagull]

The highest turnout was in Colorado (Safe Dem) 80%

Are you referring to individual districts ? If so, can you provide evidence of a 98% turnout in some ?

Evidence....

YouTube video coming your way!!

 

[symyjym]

Current turnout about 67%. How is this close to 98% or 99%, unless basic primary school maths is beyond you.

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

 

[Igzilla]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

Does help with Trump telling his supportes to vote by mail and in person, just to be sure.

 

[Curious Orange]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

You really are clutching at straws. People do turn out when they are motivated to do so. The 2016 EU referendum had a 72.2% turnout, so was presumably fraudulent by your standards too?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/eu_referendum/results

No apologies for not posting a YouTube link.

 

[beorhthelm]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

Trump increased his vote by some 8m, where they fraudulent too? that's about 12% increase, inline with the upper bound of turnout there.

 

[stewart12]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

you had a highly polarising candidate in Trump, why is it a surprise that there was a high turnout of people wanting to get him out as well as keep him in

people knew that apathy in 2016 gave him the keys to the White House and didn't want to repeat that mistake

 

[Eeyore]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

Of the ten states that had turnout over 70%, only one flipped.

The Republicans, as a result of the higher turnout, scored 71 million votes. The most since an age we don't remember.

As a result of the higher turnout, Trump has so far scored 9-10 million votes more than previously.

The Democrats scored a similar figure, maybe slightly higher at close of play which would be expected.

So, we conclude that the Republicans have benefitted from this higher number of voters.

Thoughts ?

 

[Igzilla]

Of the ten states that had turnout over 70%, only one flipped.

The Republicans, as a result of the higher turnout, scored 71 million votes. The most since an age we don't remember.

As a result of the higher turnout, Trump has so far scored 9-10 million votes more than previously.

The Democrats scored a similar figure, maybe slightly higher at close of play which would be expected.

So, we conclude that the Republicans have benefitted from this higher number of voters.

Thoughts ?

Good luck trying to use facts. You'd have been better off finding a YouTube video to present your case...

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Afterwards you can always write to him in prison.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

Why would I

It appears you are another one that thinks I am a massive Trump fan, I am not.

However, I do believe SLOW JOE is going to feck up America completely and all those gullible sheep that voted for him thinking he will change the world have a big shock.

World war 3 will not be out of the question.

You're a prick.

Hope that helps.

Should this be in the Bearpit with remarks like that

I must admit you have a consistency in what you put out.

 

[Deportivo Seagull]

Why would I

It appears you are another one that thinks I am a massive Trump fan, I am not.

However, I do believe SLOW JOE is going to feck up America completely and all those gullible sheep that voted for him thinking he will change the world have a big shock.

World war 3 will not be out of the question.



Should this be in the Bearpit with remarks like that

I must admit you have a consistency in what you put out.

You are a Trump fan as only a complete spanner would try to defend the idiot. Or maybe it because boris’s Brexit deal is screwed without trump in the Oval Office.

BTW, How can you **** up something that Trump has already ****ed up?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[peterward]

You will love this video then:

https://youtu.be/Q4xhCPcyT2o

[MENTION=616]Guinness Boy[/MENTION] "Some or all of the content shared in this post is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process."

The proof of some hammer conspiracy is 65 year old Librarian women parroting Trump's BS?

This isnt factual truth, if it was it would be proven. This is a conspiracy theory tailored more as a narrative for Trump TV propaganda viewers on Fox.

Nothing will come of it, because it's make believe.

 

[The Clamp]

Yes that was funny to be fair but we all make mistakes, including most of NSC believing this election was legit.

This video is more relevent on Trump and his disputing of the election process.

https://youtu.be/1SnVHFd_r6s

Anyway I am only too pleased to help make NSC more entertaining. Someone has to.

[MENTION=616]Guinness Boy[/MENTION] "Some or all of the content shared in this post is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process."

I think you’re probably the thickest person that’s ever posted on NSC.

 

[Machiavelli]

Definately because.

Definitely and defiantly because

 

[Deleted member 2719]

You are a Trump fan as only a complete spanner would try to defend the idiot. Or maybe it because boris’s Brexit deal is screwed without trump in the Oval Office.

BTW, How can you **** up something that Trump has already ****ed up?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What makes you think I am protecting him?

You sound like your still bitter over Brexit.

Brexit is coming if you don't like it, go and move to the states and suck on SLOW JOES TOES.

 

[Machiavelli]

Current turnout about 67%. How is this close to 98% or 99%, unless basic primary school maths is beyond you.

It is, but it's beyond me why he's resorting to getting info from the MSM

 

[Machiavelli]

Of the ten states that had turnout over 70%, only one flipped.

The Republicans, as a result of the higher turnout, scored 71 million votes. The most since an age we don't remember.

As a result of the higher turnout, Trump has so far scored 9-10 million votes more than previously.

The Democrats scored a similar figure, maybe slightly higher at close of play which would be expected.

So, we conclude that the Republicans have benefitted from this higher number of voters.

Thoughts ?

You are a generous soul, with high expectations, and I claim my five pounds.
I'm ungenerous, and expect a link.

 

[Eeyore]

The point is high voter turnout, that was just an extreme example by the BBC in the article.

2008 229,945,000 57.1%
2012 235,248,000 54.9%
2016 230,931,921 59.2%
2020 239,247,182 66.4% - 72.1%

The higher voter turnout has been shown clearly to benefit both sides.

The 98% claim was false.

Argue for voter fraud by all means, I have no doubt there may be cases, but it is important to search for facts and not partisan conjecture.

 

[Grombleton]

Between a crematorium and a sex shop?

Typical of Trumpers, don’t know whether they’re coming or going.

This is my favourite post of 2020.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Of the ten states that had turnout over 70%, only one flipped.

The Republicans, as a result of the higher turnout, scored 71 million votes. The most since an age we don't remember.

As a result of the higher turnout, Trump has so far scored 9-10 million votes more than previously.

The Democrats scored a similar figure, maybe slightly higher at close of play which would be expected.

So, we conclude that the Republicans have benefitted from this higher number of voters.

Thoughts ?

You're an optimist!

I'm going to have to salute your indefatigability