Search results

But you can Lush

70/70 But then Google is a wonderful tool

Only caught a few minutes of the game but it was enough to see RK do his best to look like he was doing an Irish jig as he went for a spectacular shot from about 4 yards out and totally missed the ball!

Sorry has been replaced by Sarah-Jane Mee as the sexiest footie/sports presenter. Ex SSN and now the sports anchor for central west (that's Birmingham for those with no idea what Central west means)

Epson 800 epson 900 both colour phot printers. There is a HP around here somewhere as well Oh and BTW http://www.theinkfactory.co.uk (www.birminghamcarers.org.uk/shop for those who wish too donate the commission on sales) or http://www.choicestationery.com/

Bugger, I was considering a punt on the scots to win @ 14/1 decided against it.

I prefer this version http://www.richsalter.net/flash_scrapbook_items/04_claykittenshooting/index.html

See some of us have too work you know! I have never claimed to be a tactical genius I just disagreed with the thread title that the game was won on tactics, play the same game tactics against a better team than Leicester were on the day and they would have murdered us. If MM Knew that...

I'd use the word honest as opposed to deluded by victory, if the pen had been given then we may not have won, in the chat room I was one of a few batting for victory when the others would have settled for a draw. As to your picky comments about my writing style that's low, even for you. Its...

Is that a new player?

OK for those who don't read too well I'll shout it I AM f***ing HAPPY! WE WON, I WON, I AM f***ing ECSTATIC Ok But it was not down to the tactics if we played like that against a team that had something about them we would have got thumped. Leicester should have at least put 3 or 4 away but...

Anyone who posts something that states we won but we were lucky is going to be classed miserable just because they dared to do that. I can live with that, but it does not make them right nor does it invalidate my argument. Such bland responses is usually a sign that they do not have the...

Juan you must explain the logic behind that post sometime but now I understand how you think McGhee is a tactical genius. I'm not miserable all I said was I did not agree that tactics won it as in the title of this thread. Please stop attributing things to me that are far from the truth. I saw...

3-2 now there I was pondering a bet on Fulham to win @80/1 (they were 3-0 down at the time) best I'll get now will be 6/1 <edit>7/1 pompey 4/9 the draw 11/4</edit>

May I suggest you all read the thread title again its a victory for tactics. Our tactics were shite and had we been playing a team who were not slightly worse than us we would have got thumped. It was a victory for luck not for the tactics, leicester had enough chances to win the game but were...

Apparently Freddy Sheppard wants Steve Bruce but it is doubted they will get him.

And how many players did Hinch have out? How long was Zamora out? How many "played well but lost" games did we have? The results were the unlucky part of Hinch, McGhee has had the luck that the last 2 results (one by a very poor own goal) have gone for him. I am sorry if I am not hypocritical...

Yes I did but not through rose tinted glasses. We were rubbish and they were slightly worse, it was not a good game. I'm not miserable, in fact I'm quite happy having put money on us winning the game, but come on get a dose of realism here if those were the best tactics McGhee can come up with...