Search results

they could appoint Benny Hill and he would do better than plonker Southgate. Even though old Benny has been dead for years.

my granddaughter has been beside herself wanting to go. Most of her school friends have tickets, and it’s been so sad watching her getting more upset as the days tick by. Today, her 2nd cousin once removed managed to by some hopefully genuine tickets via Ticketmaster and has so kindly bought...

nah, even he’s not that f##ing thick or ugly. Now that’s really sayin* something.

hope he’s not, the lounge is closed until the new season. He will get frightfully bored.

sakes..…

i’m sure he will give clear instructions. Sit back and defend deep so we don’t concede a 2nd. We may be lucky with a rogue ball and catch them on the break.

i can’t see why we can’t score at least four or five this afternoon after all Mexico aren’t that great defensively

how about graffiti removal? Every Friday and Saturday afternoon, say 14.00 until 22.00 for 6 months.

i’d rather not thank you

that’s genuinely great to learn, but don’t go inviting people up there, let alone in their vehicles it’ll be the start of ruining something precious.

similar to many JSO’s stunts then

deleted.

just thought it ironic that you were so happy to correct my typo 😂

by the way, It’s Bodiam

in fairness A1 I think that’s where the majority of us are …

No it wouldn’t be hypocritical at all, it would be abiding by the laws of the land. For sure there will always be laws that we all personally disagree with. If everyone took the view ‘ i disagree therefore i shall ignore’ we would be in an even bigger mess than we are now. you can argue that...

well I guess in a roundabout way they are correct

FFL’s, Yes they may well do, and I 100% agree thats wrong. PM‘s is nothing to do with idiots throwing powder paints. They quite rightly have, through due legal means, chased down the powers that have conspired so shamefully against them.

so they did. If I understand history correctly Mandela ended up in prison as a terrorist, yes his cause was noble and in my view correct. He became a world statesman as a politician and duly elected. So I’ll ask you, did you agree with his actions when he was/ condoned terrorism and killing...

if they were in the middle of the highway, causing an obstruction then yes they would have. Even though I 100% agreed with the sentiment EDIT : cause, as I do with climate lobbyist, breaking the law doesn’t make it right. Start to choose which laws you want upheld and which you’re happy to...