Klaas
I've changed this
- Nov 1, 2017
- 2,664
Be interested to know about that myself.Hi Westy. So far so good. The knee support that a kind fellow-NSCer recommended works a treat.
Be interested to know about that myself.Hi Westy. So far so good. The knee support that a kind fellow-NSCer recommended works a treat.
You do realise that Pikey is a racist term ?
Be interested to know about that myself.
So, if these people are accurate: https://football-observatory.com/-values-58951, Palace are only asking for a minimum of between 150% and 200% of his market value. Very reasonable. I'm sure any potential buyers would be happy to pay over the odds to ensure that CPFC don't have to cough up what they will owe to Man Utd.
But his value is his value right? A bit like us with Ben White? If we don't want to sell we put £50M on his head
But his value is his value right? A bit like us with Ben White? If we don't want to sell we put £50M on his head
But his value is his value right? A bit like us with Ben White? If we don't want to sell we put £50M on his head
So, if these people are accurate: https://football-observatory.com/-values-58951, Palace are only asking for a minimum of between 150% and 200% of his market value. Very reasonable. I'm sure any potential buyers would be happy to pay over the odds to ensure that CPFC don't have to cough up what they will owe to Man Utd.
But his value is his value right? A bit like us with Ben White? If we don't want to sell we put £50M on his head
Agreed.
It’s not dissimilar to the “Maupay for £40m” thing. As our only consistent goal threat, his value to us is likely higher than any one would currently reasonably offer.
Agreed.
It’s not dissimilar to the “Maupay for £40m” thing. As our only consistent goal threat, his value to us is likely higher than any one would currently reasonably offer.
Surely the key difference is we:
1. Don't need to sell anyone - Palace's finances are somewhat shakey and they seemingly do need to sell someone (not necessarily Zaha, but who else is worth enough?).
2. We value Maupay and White high because we don't want to sell them - Parris has told Zaha that he can leave is the right offer is received.
3. Zaha has been pushing for a move for a number of windows and will get increasingly stroppy if 'reasonable' offers are rejected.
Plus:
4. we haven't already made a profit from transferring him to a big club once previously
5. didn't **** up by trying to get him back on the cheap and accepting a ridiculously high sell on clause.
Surely the key difference is we:
1. Don't need to sell anyone - Palace's finances are somewhat shakey and they seemingly do need to sell someone (not necessarily Zaha, but who else is worth enough?).
2. We value Maupay and White high because we don't want to sell them - Parris has told Zaha that he can leave is the right offer is received.
3. Zaha has been pushing for a move for a number of windows and will get increasingly stroppy if 'reasonable' offers are rejected.
The problem is its very hard for us to sign quality players. Sadly our stature, stadium, history, financial clout and prospects mean quality players prefer to sign for others.
We can pick up slightly old fringe players from the big boys but thats about it and even with them we have to let the likes of Watford, Brighton, Villa, Southampton, Bournemouth etc have first dibs. All the above have signed players we seriously wanted so if we're being out bid by the like of them for players we want it means we are talking about the dregs it seems.
I'm not sure how we sign enough quality to adequately compensate for the loss of Wilf, its an absolutely massive challenge and a seminal moment in the history of this club.
History tells us that when we've lost a star man we are destined for fairly swift relegation.
It's time for Parish's biggest challenge yet and lets see if he can produce another Rabbit or two out of the hat.