Its a pretty curt statement. The kind you put out when somebody has left under a cloud.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Would you want Danny Cullip back at the club
- Thread starter vulture
- Start date
Its a pretty curt statement. The kind you put out when somebody has left under a cloud.
BensGrandad
New member
Absolute rubbish we could have released him from his contract pa week earlier before the transfer deadline then as a player not under contract he could have signed for any league clib if he was good enough, which unfortunately he had proved in the previous weeks he wasnt6 and that he had passed his sell by date.
I think that the same will prove the case with Cullip.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Maybe the finer details were not agreed with the relevant parties, hence he was released when he was. However the fact remains that when he was released, he could not go to another league club as it was outside of the transfer window.
BensGrandad
New member
Wrong he could have gone to another league club if he was not under contract.
The transfer dealine rules say that you cannot play in any game that affects promtion or relegation so he could have played in midtable games that affected neither relegation or promotion.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
No he could not have gone to a league club. In theory we still held his registration, so this meant as it was outside the window and not a loan, he could not go to a league club.
It was done to death on here.
BensGrandad
New member
His house in Newick has a sign to let.
Chippy Could have done a job in League two, I expect Cullip will end up at a club like MK Dons or Northampton
BensGrandad
New member
Once a club releases a player and cancelhis contract his league registration goes with it. As I said he COULD have signed for a new league club but NOT PLAYED in any games affecting promotion or relegation. Fact end of argument.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
It was on this thread;
http://www.northstandchat.biz/showthread.php?t=99080&highlight=carpenter
Post by Race.
saltash seagull
New member
your the one talking rubbish im afraid
i know someone through work who's known chippy since was a young boy his son is one of chippys lifetime buddies and he told me in the summer there had been offers on the table (brentford for a start) but chippy wanted to play locally at welling and get on with a life out side football
BensGrandad
New member
That post is also wrong my last word on this is the day he had his contract torn up he was under no contract or registration withany club so he was in the same position as Jimmy Case and as such he COULD have signed for MK Dons Man Utd or Rochdale if he wanted but he COULD NOT PLAY IN ANY GAMES THAT AFFECTED PROMOTION OR RELEGATION. That is the true facts of the matter. Whether or not a club would want to sign him and him play only 1 or 2 games during the rest of the season is another matter.
On a similar note BZ was unable to sign for West Ham because he was illegible as a Spurs player to sign so Spurs iore up his contract thus making him an uncontracted footballer that any team, us included, could have signed. The only difference being the time of the contract being torn up but the principle in football rules is the same. Chippy would have been an uncontracted out of work footballer. The emphasis is on his being able to PLAY games not sign for a club.
On a similar note BZ was unable to sign for West Ham because he was illegible as a Spurs player to sign so Spurs iore up his contract thus making him an uncontracted footballer that any team, us included, could have signed. The only difference being the time of the contract being torn up but the principle in football rules is the same. Chippy would have been an uncontracted out of work footballer. The emphasis is on his being able to PLAY games not sign for a club.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Errr Case signed for us in 1993 and there was no transfer window then.
You are wrong about Chippy and I have no idea where you have got this notion about players not being able to play in games that had any bearing on the season.
Zamora could have moved for a fee, you can have 2 moves in a 12 month period. By letting him go on a free, it meant Spurs did not get caught in any issues over clause payement to us.
saltash seagull
New member
dont think he will be going to selhurst thats for sure !
can't help but think that maybe he might be a good addition till the end of the season at least,ok he didnt impress in the reserves game but did butters when he 1st signed? he would add experience,guts and im sure returning to us would give him a new lease of life !guy is 38 he wont be able to carry on for ever and we will need someone to do what guy has done for the last 5 or 6 years adding experience at the back,can't make anymore mistakes than el abd !
can't help but think that maybe he might be a good addition till the end of the season at least,ok he didnt impress in the reserves game but did butters when he 1st signed? he would add experience,guts and im sure returning to us would give him a new lease of life !guy is 38 he wont be able to carry on for ever and we will need someone to do what guy has done for the last 5 or 6 years adding experience at the back,can't make anymore mistakes than el abd !
saltash seagull
New member
which is all true
this idea that you can play in gmes that dont effect promotion and relegation is crap
how you can talk about case and transfer windows in the same sentence is un real
the only reason spurs claimed zamora went for no fee in the defoe move wasso they didn't have to pay us money
is bens grandad pissed?
BensGrandad
New member
I used Jimmy Case as an example of a player it could have been Glen Hoddle, Tim Sherwood, Graham Le Saux any ex player who was not contracted to a club.
You are confusing signing for a club and playing for a club. The part about not being able to sign for a club after the March deadline but not play in any game affecting promotion and relegation has been in force as long as I have been watching football, over 60 years. If my memeory serves me well, we had a player who met this criteria in the 60s but his name alludes me.
The BZ thing was not over a fee for us as we had a sell on clause ifa profit was made, so had Spurs included him as part of the deal and valued him at £1m we would still have received nothing as their would have been no profit.
You are confusing signing for a club and playing for a club. The part about not being able to sign for a club after the March deadline but not play in any game affecting promotion and relegation has been in force as long as I have been watching football, over 60 years. If my memeory serves me well, we had a player who met this criteria in the 60s but his name alludes me.
The BZ thing was not over a fee for us as we had a sell on clause ifa profit was made, so had Spurs included him as part of the deal and valued him at £1m we would still have received nothing as their would have been no profit.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
There is no March deadline anymore.
There is the January transfer window and then the emergency loan period. The March deadline day went about 3 seasons ago.
saltash seagull
New member
when we signed mcdougald it was with a couple of games to go but he couldn't play as it was after the deadline
that rules a load of crap
might have been the case in he 60's but it aint now
that rules a load of crap
might have been the case in he 60's but it aint now