Tooting Gull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 11,033
Looks like the woman who has tragically lost the sight of one eye after being hit by a shot from Koepka is going to sue the organisers. The player was clearly shaken up both at the time, and when he got the news yesterday.
But is this negligence or evidence of any wrongdoing by the organisers? Or just a very unfortunate accident with no one to blame? You'd have thought financially it wouldn't be difficult for Koepka and the event to cough up some money, as it will have badly affected her life.
But you also have to be aware of what could happen when you buy a ticket, and if you are in range keep some idea of where the ball could come. Same at the cricket albeit a bigger and more easily visible ball, if you ignore what is happening on the pitch completely, that ball can do a lot of damage.
Feel very bad for the victim here, just not sure the organisers could have done much different.
But is this negligence or evidence of any wrongdoing by the organisers? Or just a very unfortunate accident with no one to blame? You'd have thought financially it wouldn't be difficult for Koepka and the event to cough up some money, as it will have badly affected her life.
But you also have to be aware of what could happen when you buy a ticket, and if you are in range keep some idea of where the ball could come. Same at the cricket albeit a bigger and more easily visible ball, if you ignore what is happening on the pitch completely, that ball can do a lot of damage.
Feel very bad for the victim here, just not sure the organisers could have done much different.