Spot on. Hardly any balls went into the crowd in comparison to how many normally do in big tournaments.During the event I recall one pundit saying how impressed he was that on this course the spectators were further away from the fairways than normal and that in most big tournaments the crowd are nearer, resulting in the rough being trampled down and many balls striking people and therefore not disappearing out of bounds.
It's a tragic accident.
1 - I think she is from overseas from when I read about this yesterday, did she not get travel insurance
.
What terms within your travel insurance would cover this?
1 - I think she is from overseas from when I read about this yesterday, did she not get travel insurance.
What do you mean? I get it free with my credit card but I definitely wouldn't book a holiday without it.Do many people still get travel insurance?
What do you mean? I get it free with my credit card but I definitely wouldn't book a holiday without it.
In two cases, it's saved me thousands (one of which I took out a specific policy for as I wasn't sure the free insurance would cover the trip).
Unfortunately indemnity signs warning people are a grey area in the eyes of a good lawyer ( is that an oxymoron). I have marshalled at three golf tournaments and playing the game I can follow the ball 8n flight and if neccessary take a precautions whilst warning the spectators as well.
As mentioned this is an unfortunate accident with a horrid outcome. I read somewhere there should be netting to protect the crowd, have these people actually been to a golf course, totally Impractical.
Many years ago they erected debris fencing at Silverstone to prevent bits of racing cars going into the crowd, it worked only problem was you couldn't see through it, the further away you were from it.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Legally though, that means nothing if negligence can be proved on the part of the organisers.Bound to be something in the small print that says you attend at your own risk. Doubtless also buried somewhere deep in the T&Cs at the Amex.
I’ve not had travel insurance for years, possibly decades. Health wise I’m already covered for mishaps via my health insurance but I have never taken any further insurance to cover flights or accommodation. I’ve never really seen the need.
The two claims I've mentioned were firstly when me and the family were in Fontainebleau, a trip we'd done numerous times when the nipper was small as it's a great place for families with young kids and I got to go bouldering in the greatest place in the world for it.I’ve not had travel insurance for years, possibly decades. Health wise I’m already covered for mishaps via my health insurance but I have never taken any further insurance to cover flights or accommodation. I’ve never really seen the need.
Definitely a few loud warning shouts, whether they would have been heard c250 yards away with crowd chatter etc is another question..........
https://twitter.com/JosAl45444022/status/1047057410777583617
Looks like the woman who has tragically lost the sight of one eye after being hit by a shot from Koepka is going to sue the organisers. The player was clearly shaken up both at the time, and when he got the news yesterday.
But is this negligence or evidence of any wrongdoing by the organisers? Or just a very unfortunate accident with no one to blame? You'd have thought financially it wouldn't be difficult for Koepka and the event to cough up some money, as it will have badly affected her life.
But you also have to be aware of what could happen when you buy a ticket, and if you are in range keep some idea of where the ball could come. Same at the cricket albeit a bigger and more easily visible ball, if you ignore what is happening on the pitch completely, that ball can do a lot of damage.
Feel very bad for the victim here, just not sure the organisers could have done much different.
The lady in question is French, from Lyon; it's unlikely she had travel insurance for the trip to Paris(ish).