Grombleton
Surrounded by <div>s
- Dec 31, 2011
- 7,356
It wasnt thrown as an insult, thats my point, it was an obsevation.
Was it a necessary one? Could you have gone about your day without feeling the need to say it?
It wasnt thrown as an insult, thats my point, it was an obsevation.
Show me EXACTLY where i said that ? And they did offer us an armistice, why do you think hess was sent here.I asked another poster if he thought it was not at all in Britains self interest to fight the Nazi's.
Which prompted from you, "The Germans offered us an armistice, they would have europe, we would keep the empire, we turned them down."
Not only reinventing 20th century history, now trying to reinvent stuff you posted in this thread minutes ago!
I understand you believe Britain chose to fight the Nazi's just because it was the right thing to do, but it was not quite as simple as that. I also understand and am disgusted by your belief that everyone else in Europe "chose" to roll over and not fight, and if they died it was less heroic than Brits dying, because they had no choice, they were being invaded. Well in 1939, we had conscription, so little choice for our boys either, is their sacrifice less because they were conscripts rather than volunteers?
There is always a choice, often a bad one and a terrible one, and I hope we never have to make choices of that magnitude again.
Brilliant.
We've met once, briefly in a pub in Lewes, when I stopped in for twenty minutes to collect something from a friend. You later (on line, rather than at the time, in real life) professed that I was 'wet' for refusing to drink more than one pint (as I was driving). Its an interesting observation though - this autism thing. Its not something I've ever been told before, in any of the varied circles of my life.
Do you find that people often seem uncharacteristically uncomfortable in your presence?
It wasnt thrown as an insult.
No it was his general demeanour , failure to make eye contact and his whispering to the other person in the group, which i later found out was an instruction not to let me know who he was , as i said , strange.So just to confirm
Not a drink driver = autistic.
Interesting................................I shall pursue further research.
So it was not in Britains self interests at all?
its not just in my presence that you have that demeanour though is it ?Of course it was, you nasty, pathetic oaf.
Just for clarity - your observation was a poor one. I am not autistic so easy to shrug off, though I do take offence on behalf of friends who are, and whose children are, that you throw it around as a playground insult.
Like I've said, if my demeanour was uncomfortable in your presence, perhaps there were other reasons for that, that you might wish to contemplate.
Can't this thread just be closed now that it's descended into pure binfest. The poll has been highly illuminating in that the overwhelming number of responders (95%+) would stick by their original vote. Is there really anything more to be gained from the thread, which can only go further downhill from here on in.
Is there really anything more to be gained from the thread
Depends on how much value you place on one poster demonstrating in amazing clarity how much of an obnoxious oaf they are?
I didnt vote because I do not think that either side gave sufficient definitive information of how it would affect us either way.
Can't this thread just be closed now that it's descended into pure binfest. The poll has been highly illuminating in that the overwhelming number of responders (95%+) would stick by their original vote. Is there really anything more to be gained from the thread, which can only go further downhill from here on in.
Are you kidding?
This is the best thread in AGES
what to have a whole generation of young men wiped out ...........not in their interest no
Can't this thread just be closed now that it's descended into pure binfest. The poll has been highly illuminating in that the overwhelming number of responders (95%+) would stick by their original vote. Is there really anything more to be gained from the thread, which can only go further downhill from here on in.
Although I agree with your point about the thread, which seems to have go very weird very quickly, I find it interesting that, if these figures are representative across the country (presuming that it is leavers who regret their actions) the small percentage who would change would be enough to reverse the decision. It makes me wonder why Cameron was so blase about allowing such a monumental change to be decided without requiring a significant majority. The Scottish and Welsh independence referendums run by Callaghan in 1979 had set a precedent for this requirement.
Show me EXACTLY where i said that ? And they did offer us an armistice, why do you think hess was sent here.
Please tell me what's happened to the emergency £30bln budget threatened in the event of an exit vote? Both sides LIED, but you sdeem to be very selective in which lies you disapprove of.