Bissouma-esque shot, just reached the Ionosphere.
12 shirts . . .GET IN!Kane with the 2nd. Enjoy the ironing!
I’m not sure how clever it was playing without energy or quality until around 25 minutes, at which point we could’ve been a goal down. Going gung-ho isn’t the same as playing with attacking ambition and not thinking possession in our third is “controlling” a game. The last 3/4 of the game, England played good stuff. Confident football, nothing gung-ho about it. Controlling the game and picking moments, rather than sideways, back, long, midfield battle, sideways, back, long.No, see you've got it completely wrong again. in previous tournaments we were naive, played gung-ho and pumped it forward. Cleverer oppponents played more patiently, took the sting out of us, we got frustrated a crumbled. Now WE are playing the intelligent game and credit to Southgate for identifying that and implementing it
Didn't we beat Colombia on pens on itv!?The curse of ITV has been lifted!
Penalties don't countDidn't we beat Colombia on pens on itv!?
And if Senegal had scored, we'd still probably have beat them, so he didn't 'keep us in the world cup'Reactively sticking his arm out to the mishit or deflected shot.
Diving to the feet of attacker clean through 5 yards out.
I just asked you what the Lloris offense was as it wasn’t clear to me, that’s all. I explained why.You constantly pick out my comments and challenge them, even if they’re simply “the sky is blue”. The last one was about Lloris on the penalty, a few hours ago, in this thread. I’m right every single time, if you read back. If you’re going to constantly challenge someone for frankly unknown reasons, I’m a horrible choice…
All part of the plan (a few missed passes aside). Invite them to put pressure on us high up the pitch. Then on half hour or so, start going long and catch them out. Obviously can't be certain, but I'm quite confident that would've been part of the game plan.The first 35 minutes aside, that was as good as we were likely to see.