MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,875
ANOTHER reason to say no to a winter break. DIY and Bluewater.
*shudder*
You just KNOW it's going to be described as a Xmas Shopping Break at some point don't you.
Come Armageddon, Come.
ANOTHER reason to say no to a winter break. DIY and Bluewater.
*shudder*
Are you seriously saying the weather in June or July could he worse then in December or January!? I don't think so.
In terms of pitches, I think you have a very narrow viewpoint there. There are more pitches than just the top four divisions and even within them some pitches look terrible over the winter.
As for the freshness, why then do england players claim fatigue compared to players from countries with a break during event international tournament?
By the way I am not 100% for a winter break, but I don't think it would do any harm really. I think there are a lot of people who are just scared of change and refuse to look at it in objectively.
Would not be shocked if the PL used this as a chance to switch to 18 teams
As was the original plan at the inception of the PL.
But you'd need the clubs to vote for it. And how many are going to vote for a bigger relegation trapdoor to trim the division down to 18 ? You'd get nowhere near 20 votes for it, that's for sure. Plus less teams = less fixtures = less £. Can't see it.
Less Fixtures means a higher % on TV, something they can sell on.
I think you would be shocked, I would imagine Chelsea/City/Arsenal/Utd/Spurs/Liverpool/Swansea/Stoke/Everton/Newcastle/West Ham would as it would be a bigger pay out if less teams.
I don't think 18 teams is a bad thing as we do play to much football in this country.
I don't think 18 teams would be a bad thing either. But I think its a real stretch to say that the 11 clubs you list would potentially vote in favour of chopping the number of clubs in the PL. They all know which side their bread is buttered - they'd each be losing 4 games a season and increasing the risk of relegation, for perhaps a small % increase from the TV revenue pot.
And who's to say the new TV deal wouldn't be cut to reflect the smaller league. Less games = less product to sell.
Why would it cause any fixture congestion? The season would be as long as before. Same number of games, same number of weeks.
Season starts later = more time to tour the fair east and USA.....
I would cut down all the leagues - a 24 team league is insane.
Will the third and fourth divisions be cancelled too?No Brighton game on Boxing Day!!!! Bollox to that.
The same applies without a break though. There is still a hard deadline. Bad weather causes fixture congestion whatever. Unless it happens in the break.
Easier said than done - where do you "cut" these clubs, where do they go ?
18 Pl clubs
18 championship clubs
20 League 1
20 league 2 north
20 league 2 south
Expand the league by a few teams and go back to having a north and south second division.
We over play players, especially young players and smaller clubs would save money by having more local games.
Thats not a bad shout at all actually.