clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,876
No one was put in charge of manageing the architect which has proved to be a fundemental flaw in the design process consequenttly we have a stadium that looks like a supermarket
Keep going
No one was put in charge of manageing the architect which has proved to be a fundemental flaw in the design process consequenttly we have a stadium that looks like a supermarket
There aren't any portakabins. I'd imagine you are looking at the entrance to the platforms. You are living in the last century when you talk of "disabled areas".
"disabled overload". Brilliant. Not sure if you haven't noticed that going to football is one of the things that disabled people have just about managed to do in this country for years. Haven't quite managed to get them on the tube yet.
I agree they are somewhat "invisible", but there is a reason for that. Although football has a long history of disabled access, where it has got things wrong is by shoving them all into a corner or pitch side. In the modern world (do keep up) - if you get the chance to build a new stadium the general idea is to give as far as possible choice.
Why shouldn't disabled people be allowed the choice of an elevated view like everyone else. Does that seriously upset you ?
It's a fascinating viewpoint to take and worthy of deeper discussion: I aesthetically prefer continuous seats in a photograph of the empty stadium over raised platforms for the disabled.
I havent seen these types of platforms at any new stadia so its nothing to do with the past.
They've got "missing seats" at the Emirates....
I agree wheelchair access should be able to view a match from all areas, but it could have been done so it didnt impact on the way the stand looks.
I agree wheelchair access should be able to view a match from all areas, but it could have been done so it didnt impact on the way the stand looks.
We are struggling to understand. Does a raised disabled platform embarrass you ?
I would suggest, you are digging a bloody big hole for yourself, why not wait till its finished and full of fans before slagging off the design, as assumed by an internet drawing
I'm not. Look at the plans and it does look like that. The angle of that mockup means that you can't see the 3 rows of seats in front of the disabled area and the 6 behind are obscured by the short wall in front of it.
View attachment 31879
That looks such an improvement than that mock up on the official site. The other one has a row of seats stuck in the wall in the north stand. How can anyone take that mock up for real when he's added rows here and there and taken the TV away.
It seems he/she has done the mock up to suit how they'd like it to be.
No, I think you're confused, this looks f***ing awful:
What a freakish thing to say. Really weird. I'm as diverse as the next man. Nice try but it's time to stop fishing.
The tier looks Shit nonetheless. Hopefully the tier in the flesh - which ive said all along anyway - will look better than the mock up.
If it makes the stand look that shit and stops another 1000 seats being installed yes I am..
You've said a number of things. In reply to: Are you against raised platforms for the disabled in principle then ?
You replied....
Nice.
To be fair Clapham Gull although dig is literally digging himself a hole he can't really turn his argument around now, so some of you are in the process of humiliating him. I do agree with his sentiments that the East Stand Upper looks very poor and somewhat shoddy, and considering around 80 mill was spent on the ground alone, you'd think the architecture would have a little more aforethought. The disabled areas could have easily have been factored in, in a better way in order to make the aesthetics of the stadium more pleasing on the eye, assuming the official picture. There is also the obvious thought that more seats and more bums could be placed in the area that is being put aside. Personally I think it looks ridiculous and I am hoping it looks better in real life than it does in the official mock up. I'd be a little sad to see the amount of money spent on our stadium not looking quite right.
Sorry if I have missed this but it seems strange to me that disabled supporters are somehow going to be able to get up to the level of ESU which will involve a certain number of steps or is there going to be a lift available for them ?
No i think they're being dropped in by parachute.
To be fair Clapham Gull although dig is literally digging himself a hole he can't really turn his argument around now, so some of you are in the process of humiliating him. I do agree with his sentiments that the East Stand Upper looks very poor and somewhat shoddy, and considering around 80 mill was spent on the ground alone, you'd think the architecture would have a little more aforethought. The disabled areas could have easily have been factored in, in a better way in order to make the aesthetics of the stadium more pleasing on the eye, assuming the official picture. There is also the obvious thought that more seats and more bums could be placed in the area that is being put aside. Personally I think it looks ridiculous and I am hoping it looks better in real life than it does in the official mock up. I'd be a little sad to see the amount of money spent on our stadium not looking quite right.