Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,401
Finchley Seagull said:Anyone can play with passion.
No they can't.
Finchley Seagull said:Anyone can play with passion.
chez said:If Kuipers stays in the team he could very well cost us our League 1 status. I hope Wilkins see's sense and gets rid of him. There is NO WAY he should be offered a new contract. Out with the useless deadwood I say. Thats not being harsh just honest, Carpenter should not be offered a new one either. Both players good in there day - about 4 years ago, neither up to league standard anymore.
Rookie said:got to disagree, think having Kuipers on the bench gives us the best keeping line up in the league and will also allow Sullivan and Martin to go out on loan again and get more game experience. Competition for places is good
Really don't think he will cost us out league 1 status either
Icy Gull said:Hendo is No1.
The Complete Badger said:
So what if he can't kick? Do we really need to talk about it? It's not like anyone on here doesn't know that. The point is, kicking is a totally trivial part of the game for a goalkeeper (
The Complete Badger said:I love the way everyone claims the clean sheet was purely down to Michel not having any shots to save. Don't you think the reason for this is possibly because he is such an accomplished, organised, and responsible keeper? Compare this to the erratic clown we usually endure each week, and it's hardly surprising to find that the opposition have gone from causing complete panic in our box to not having a shot.
So what if he can't kick? Do we really need to talk about it? It's not like anyone on here doesn't know that. The point is, kicking is a totally trivial part of the game for a goalkeeper (unless your name is Mark McGhee), whereas organising a defence and stopping the ball ending up in your net are quite significant - both aspects that Michel has proved he is superior at.
Long may he reign
chez said:I sense a hell of a lot of tongue in cheek in yopur post mate but I'll reply anyway.
Firstly to echo Yorkie's reply earlier about defence playing so well coz KTC was in goal..... Having a laugh!
dougdeep said:She didn't and who is KTC?
chez said:If Kuipers stays in the team he could very well cost us our League 1 status.
The Complete Badger said:Kicking isn't as important as commanding the area and organising though, is it? It's not like Michel passes straight to the opposition strikers - the worst we are looking at is conceding a throw-in on the half way line!
I agree with you about there not being much between them, in terms of talent. If anything, I am more comfortable with our Wayne in situations like backpasses, and coming (and holding) crosses. The problem is he couldn't organise a prayer in a mosque. Until that's sorted, as well as his confidence is back, it's Michel all the way. Don't get me wrong, I think Henderson could be a very good goalkeeper, but he needs to be a lot more commanding and instill confidence in the defence to justify his place. Currently, and for the forseeable future, Michel is miles ahead in that department (and one mix up in his first game in months doesn't change that).
Albion Dan said:What a load of complete bollocks. Are you that caught up in this Hendo v Kuipers argument (and the fact that Mcghee fell out with Kuipers) that you can say stuff like that, read it back, and not feel deep embarrasment.
Kuipers was the keeper that pulled off stunning saves to get us back to back championships and also keep us in the Championship. Was no coincidence that as soon as he got injured we almost went down season before last.
The bloke is a class act and any other div 1 team would be glad to have him between the sticks.
Albion Dan said:
The bloke is a class act and any other div 1 team would be glad to have him between the sticks.
The Complete Badger said:Nothing tongue-in-cheek whatsoever!
You can't seriously be telling me that Michel's kicking gives the other team a significant advantage? From what I can tell, he has two standard kicks: a) goes straight up in the air, usually just about making halfway, and it becomes a free-for-all in midfield, and b) Hooked straight out of play on the halfway line.
So, with that in mind, what advantage do the opposition get bar a throw-in? You can't be implying a throw-in fifty yards from goal gives them an advantage?
chez said:Then why did no fucker want him when we were begging them to take him off our hands?
Simple reason is that he's JUST NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
chez said:Then why did no fucker want him when we were begging them to take him off our hands?
Simple reason is that he's JUST NOT GOOD ENOUGH.