The Modfather
New member
terrible article, is he back on the smack.
the difference being that Self is making a valid point, albeit not very well.
Critically acclaimed by other idiots like Self. I also find his newspaper articles pretty boring, but as you say its all about opinions. Everytime I see him on TV I end up turning it off as he sneers his way to putting everyone else down. I would like him to take a critical look at himself.
Oliver is making a difference with what he is doing (including the 5 chain employing troubled youngsters and the school lunch campaign), Self is just doing a job that makes NO difference to anyone except to himself as he builds up his importance by being a moaning, critical idiot!
Anyway I had an essay at school that was critically acclaimed at school. They all claimed it was rubbish but hey I know that not what you meant but who cares!
Went in the Jamie Oliver Brighton shop recently and was told I could only buy bottled beer if I drank it in the shop. Not sure they'll be getting much of my custom in future.
I must have missed that then. What's the valid point? That the working classes ought to know their place? That Self doesn't care for Oliver or his type? That Self wants us to know how much cleverer he is than Oliver?
Can't agree with any of that. What Russell Brand was saying transcends arguing about spending a few million on sure-start centres, minimum wage etc. All of that is small fry and a smokescreen, we all waste our time arguing about what pocket change is being spent on while corporations take over the world.
Robert Webb has just proved that he can't think beyond the politics bubble that we're locked into at the moment, and he's spectacularly missed the point that Brand was making.
Critically acclaimed being the operative word , the average person wouldn't ever have heard of any of his books , same for his shoplifting for the Booker prize and London review of books , Joe public really doesn't show a lot of Iinterest so we're left with the new York times and evening standard and if you don't live or work in those places the chances are you won't read the papers , so we''re reduced to left leaning publications and the odd appearance on question time to account for his ' fame ' .Other than 9 critically acclaimed novels, short listed Man Booker Prize, award winning short stories, journalist for the Guardian, Observer, The New York Times, London Review of Books, The Evening Standard, The Times, The New Statesmen.
Not bad for having done 'f*** all to deserve it'....
Critically acclaimed being the operative word , the average person wouldn't ever have heard of any of his books
Critically acclaimed being the operative word , the average person wouldn't ever have heard of any of his books , same for his shoplifting for the Booker prize and London review of books , Joe public really doesn't show a lot of Iinterest so we're left with the new York times and evening standard and if you don't live or work in those places the chances are you won't read the papers , so we''re reduced to left leaning publications and the odd appearance on question time to account for his ' fame ' .
terrible article, is he back on the smack.
Very much this.If i went for a pint with Jamie Oliver i am sure i would have a good laugh,
if i went for a pint with Will Self i would either want to knock him out or knock myself out.
Critically acclaimed being the operative word , the average person wouldn't ever have heard of any of his books , same for his shoplifting for the Booker prize and London review of books , Joe public really doesn't show a lot of Iinterest so we're left with the new York times and evening standard and if you don't live or work in those places the chances are you won't read the papers , so we''re reduced to left leaning publications and the odd appearance on question time to account for his ' fame ' .
That's the last time I buy you a pre match pint! *.
*it's not but I'll strike Messrs Oliver and Self off the pre match conversation list
I must have missed that then. What's the valid point? That the working classes ought to know their place? That Self doesn't care for Oliver or his type? That Self wants us to know how much cleverer he is than Oliver?
I was just going to post on this to say that Will Self does make an extremely valid point when he says:
"What this society needs is a culture that values its eternal soul above its lemon sole and a form of social justice that doesn’t depend on the tit-beating self-righteousness of charity – with all the patronising bullshit that goes along with this."
I've just put in bold what I think needs emphasising...... not trying to patronise anyone.
Ironically, I can't help thinking that Jamie Oliver would probably agree with that.
Am I alone in quite liking both Jamie Oliver and Will Self.
Will Self thinks that what we need a society where no group is dependant on charity. Jesus wept, is this the great insight? Is he claiming this as his own idea? I'm sure Jamie would agree with that, it's such a truism that I'm struggling to think of any fair-minded individual who hasn't thought of this many times before.