happypig
Staring at the rude boys
Falkor, I have sent you a PM about this.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Will i have to go to court?
- Thread starter Falkor
- Start date
happypig
Staring at the rude boys
Innocent until proven guilty.
I've known people plead not guilty because they have a holiday booked and only one of them drives.
I've known people plead not guilty because they have a holiday booked and only one of them drives.
hitony
Administrator
He is banned so won't be able to reply.
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
Go onto Seagullschat, he's over there.
Mind you, you may have to wait about 2 weeks for a reply.
Mind you, you may have to wait about 2 weeks for a reply.
Hardly a credible witness.junior
Well-known member
His post were leading towards suggesting that he was going to bottle going to court.
Langley
New member
If they are breathalysed and fail, it does. It doesn't matter if how long ago you had a drink, if it's still in your system you've had it.
sydney
tinky ****in winky
i completely fail to see why this thread has been bounced ..........and why is falkor banned.......
obviously nothing to do with this thread...
has the bird just got sentenced or let off ...
obviously nothing to do with this thread... has the bird just got sentenced or let off ...You have missed the point of that discussion.
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
Its quite simple, it does not matter how long ago you consumed alcohol , if its still in your system, and the above the legal limit you are not safe to drive.
Saying "even though they were to all intense and purpose safe" who's making that decision?.
Its not the members of the public remit to be able to decide this. That why there have calibrated equipment to test drivers.
Last edited:
You've missed the point of the discussion too, and seem unable to think for yourself.
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
You seemed to be unable to debate or provide valid arguments. What is the point your are making with this response?
I debated the point over 6 months ago, and now two of you have taken one post out of context and questioned it. My point is that you have missed the point of the discussion, and that if you are interested in the discussion you should read all of it and understand it before jumping to conclusions.
My comment about being unable to think for yourself related to your opinion that what is safe to drive depends on the legal limit, which makes no sense at all. Obviously the intention is to create a legal limit which prevents people driving when unsafe, but if for example the limit was removed, that doesn't mean it's suddenly safe to drive when shitfaced. Equally, if the limit is changed such that any alcohol found in your blood results in a ban, that doesn't mean it's suddenly unsafe to drive if you had a tiny sip of wine. And that's what the discussion was about - whether or not it would be easier to just say the safe limit is zero, so don't drink at all.
hitony
Administrator
And were...........OFF!!!!!! another 6 pages 2 bannings shit loads of popcorn and total abuse towards the mods............
Garage_Doors
Originally the Swankers
And were...........OFF!!!!!! another 6 pages 2 bannings shit loads of popcorn and total abuse towards the mods............
Shut your face and keep out of it.