Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Hmmm, not sure he is going anywhere. A 3 year contract would cost rather a lot to pay up.
No funding when we needed some investment in the team and LDC did there bit as well. But it was the championship a much higher standard of football than where we are. I want BHAFC to be as successful as possible, we just disagree on the manager to deliver that, to be accuse of wanting the team to fail is pretty low really but hardly suprising really
I don't hero-worship Wilkins, but that's different from actively wanting him dismissed from the club. You do not rate Wilkins because you point-blank refuse to acknowledge the restrictions he is working under (admittedly McGhee had the same restrictions), and the job (which is now different from McGhee's) he is being tasked to perform. Different insofar as Wilkins is having to re-build a squad predominantly made up of kids. Is it my imagination or is it that you want - demand - success now, now, now?bit harsh Al, thats something I cannot accept , I do not rate Wilkins to be fair never had but to criticise this present manager I am wanting the club to fail, what planet are you on, I backed McGhee, Taylor and previous managers it was trendy to slag off by the double standards of NSC hypocracy but becuase it does not fit your agenda that I do not hero worship Wilkins like you do I am accused of wanting the club to fail with some side swipes about what a failure in life I am compared to your wonderful life achievements. Get yer head from out your backside, with respect old chum
Hmmm, not sure he is going anywhere. A 3 year contract would cost rather a lot to pay up.
Think there is a clause saying the club only have to give him 6 months pay if he is sacked
Pipe Down Piers
just felt felt like saying it really
As constructive as your anti Wlikins ramblings then?
So you said, but, using your 'results' quote aside (even that holds little water as you only limit yourself to home results), you still haven't said why - and to be honest I don't care because all you've done is moan and grizzle.Al, fair comments I just feel we could attract a much better manager than Wilkins even with the money constraints, its not Wilkins fault, anyone would have probably taken the job, just he was not the right choice last September and he still isn't.
the fact you still refer to McGhee in your signature a year after he was sacked make me think its time you moved on as well, your goal of getting him sacked was achieved a long time again
the fact you still refer to McGhee in your signature a year after he was sacked make me think its time you moved on as well, your goal of getting him sacked was achieved a long time again
Talking of pots and kettles... The only reason you are so anti-Wilkins is because you were so blindly pro-McGhee. Sour grapes is not a very convincing argument for sacking a manager.
Now lets stop being sensible here.
All we need is 'Early Season Results Do Not Count' back to tell us why we are all wrong....
I knew you would start to miss him eventually.