But you did respond! You couldn't resist it could you! And fair enough, whilst I no longer give a toss about ancient history if you want to keep dragging it up (and as as been pointed out you only seem to surface when Wilkins or Hammond is being discussed) then that's your perogative.I like the way you make YOUR point on an issue you then say you don't give a toss about, whilst announcing any likely response to YOUR view to being boring.
A little childish, if you have a point and wish to post it as you have, accept some might wish to respond.
I actually do not wish to respond to YOUR flawed view because I happen to find YOU boring.
I think the thing that really rankles with you is that despite post after post after post you've made on the subject over the years most of us still basically think that Hammond was greedy bastard of whom we are well rid.