No. As I said I won't be watching a FIFA organised world cup played in stadiums built by migrant workers resulting in thousands of deaths.I certainly agree that FIFA are the problem far more than Qatar. But don’t expect it to change. Infantino is about to be re-elected unopposed. So I assume these boycotts of international games will stay in place for people for long after Qatar is finished?
Go on then - educate me and give me the facts. How many?I would try and get your facts right. The 6500 number is just plain wrong. I'm surprised the guardian haven't retracted that.
Fair enough. As I say though, what I believe you are missing in trying to understand people's reasons is that their is a list of shitfuckery that is accompanying this world cup. That list is longer then ever before and has pushed it over people's red line.I’m answering posts where people are quoting me and asking me questions
Bore off.
Not sure I understand. FIFA are the problem but you'll go back to other tournaments? Like the US / Canada / Mexico fest in 2026?No. As I said I won't be watching a FIFA organised world cup played in stadiums built by migrant workers resulting in thousands of deaths.
YupStandard.
If we beat someone, we're still shit.
If we lose to someone, we're ULTRA shit.
Any progress = lucky
Bore off.
Equidem think the toll is in the hundreds. One things for sure it's not 6500 or close to that.Go on then - educate me and give me the facts. How many?
The meaning of odious is 'extremely unpleasant; repulsive' can you honestly say GS is any of those things? If you can have you got examples of such behaviour? To me he always comes across as a really decent guy and lets face it if at the start of his tenure we were offered a semi and a final appearance we would've taken it. Obviously I acknowledge you are entitled to express an opinion on here.What an embarrassing post.
They played Iran, and still managed to concede two goals. I won't be watching them and I stand by what I said - I will not watch a single game they play with that odious man in charge. Unless of course they play Equador, where I'll be cheering on the team in yellow.
Fair enough and thanks for the reply. If it is in the hundreds my point still stands - it's crossed the red line for me.Equidem think the toll is in the hundreds. One things for sure it's not 6500 or close to that.
Fair enough and thanks for the reply. If it is in the hundreds my point still stands - it's crossed the red line for me.
What a joke of a post. Who are you trying to impress? What have you got against a hugely talented crop of youngsters who've (again) started a tournament (where it matters, albeit in the shitshow that is this WC) very well? (You do realise we scored 6 and didn't just concede 2)What an embarrassing post.
They played Iran, and still managed to concede two goals. I won't be watching them and I stand by what I said - I will not watch a single game they play with that odious man in charge. Unless of course they play Equador, where I'll be cheering on the team in yellow.
I've hardly peppered this thread with posts, merely expressed an opinion like most others. And pushed back on the likes of yourself, who have decided that Southgate is some kind of gruesome scumbag, and the England squad not worthy of the filth you would scrape from your shoe following an afternoon stroll in Croydon.You're the one keep rabitting on
Ha! Your point is valid and I haven't posted on this thread as I'm more on the side of the boycotters (I haven't watched any games so far, including the Iran game, but I may do some others).Just baffles me that those who have a World Cup to watch are spending time here on the one thread for those not watching the World Cup. I believe there’s ‘per match’ threads and everything for the games.
It’s almost as if they feel huge levels of subconscious guilt and need to posture and attack those who have decided not to participate to continue to feel ok about themselves. They need group affirmation that their (in)actions are ok.
Otherwise, they’d be on the World Cup match threads, celebrating the glorious spectacle of the Qatar World Cup, not here sniping at those who (for whatever reason) have turned away.
It's never been an either/or binary position with which NSC threads to post on. One generally isn't automatically ruled out of posting on one thread because one's posted on others.Just baffles me that those who have a World Cup to watch are spending time here on the one thread for those not watching the World Cup. I believe there’s ‘per match’ threads and everything for the games.
It’s almost as if they feel huge levels of subconscious guilt and need to posture and attack those who have decided not to participate to continue to feel ok about themselves. They need group affirmation that their (in)actions are ok.
Otherwise, they’d be on the World Cup match threads, celebrating the glorious spectacle of the Qatar World Cup, not here sniping at those who (for whatever reason) have turned away.
This is the bizarre thing. Yes there are some that are not watching on a moral basis but some of the comments about hating England's team are pathetic.How can you hate a bunch of young really talented English lads that love playing for their country.
Strange I don't get it?