Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 9,122
I pretty much agree with all of that. The BBC are running down Cameron this morning but aren't the BBC notoriously pro Labour ?.
They are notoriously pro-labour but i do not believe that is actually true. If anything the beeb is quite centre-right these days and is too frightened of the pro-tory press to actually be much of anything these days.
Cameron just wasn't that great last night. It was a format that should have suited him and he failed to live up to expectations. There is just little substance to the man and waving the 'efficiency savings wand' just isn't going to cut it when real answers are needed for the economy. For all his ranting and raving about how Brown got the economy into this mess, I fail to see how, had the conservatives been in power they would have prevented the same thing happening, after all they favour in less regulation of the banks than labour.
The defecit exists because of a collapse in poorly run banking system and a ruinious involvement in vanity conflicts in the middle east, all of which would still have taken place under a tory watch. And truth be told once the crisis did hit, at least the government did something about it and a sensibly paced recovery is under way. I am still not entirely clear what the conservative response would have been, other than possibly putting thousands of public sector workers out of a job.
The tories have had a rare opportunity to come with a sensible response to a quite frankly dismal government and have failed to do so, which is quite frankly astonishing. The conservatives have remained the party that continues to look for the top 20-30per cent of society, if they are to solidly break through the 40 per cent barrier they have to be more than that.
I thought the debate was a pretty good one, and a lot better than I hoped. I wouldn't say I was looking forward to the next two, but I will tune in.