- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
True.
But I see where that poster is coming from.
I voted Labour (holding my nose), there are a few other parties I’d have considered but my main intention was to keep Johnson out because I thought he’d wreck the Country (he is actually doing a far worse job than I could have imagined) being a man totally unfit for office.
However, with the Covid-19 crises, Corbyn would have been almost as bad in the long term economically speaking. Whilst I think he would have protected the nation a lot better from infection and that we’d be looking at maybe 20,000 less deaths, we would be well on our way to bankruptcy now (although I appreciate the No Deal Brexit we’re currently on course for might have a similar affect).
The last last election was frying pan or fire.
I agree that the last election wasn't the greatest of choices , but I'm interested why you think we would have been in a worse situation economically under a Corbyn Government given what Covid has done to the economy anyway.
(And I don't think a Corbyn majority was ever going to happen. The alternative to Johnson would have been a coalition of some sort). Which, of course, would have pleased [MENTION=1200]Harry Wilson's tackle[/MENTION] immensely.
Last edited: