Kylies Stunt Arse
What?
ChapmansThe Saviour said:Have you given up smoking too?
*snappy*
Yes.
I'm right though.
ChapmansThe Saviour said:Have you given up smoking too?
*snappy*
goldstone said:Agree entirely. Who will remember any of the 1995 - 2005 popular music in 20 years time? No one!
Last decent bands/artists were in the 60s and 70s. Showing my age!
Grendel said:... time has weeded out the crap, if you like.
Grendel said:People look back on the 60s and 70s through rose tinted glasses. All that's happened is that the immense amount of shit that was released and charted in that period has been long forgotten - time has weeded out the crap, if you like.
People will remember music from 1995-2005 in the future, and I think the fact that you can still hear Oasis or Blur songs on the radio that were released over 10 years ago shows that. There have been a lot of good bands over the last decade that people will continue to listen to in the future.
goldstone said:On the other hand ... sixties and seventies music ... can still recognise the artists, the titles of the songs ... that was decent music ...
goldstone said:OK, maybe it is my age plus the fact I have not been able to summon up the interest to listen to much new music in the past 15 years .... BUT .... I do not know the name of one song by Blur or Oasis and if I heard one on the radio I would have no idea of the artist's name.
On the other hand ... sixties and seventies music ... can still recognise the artists, the titles of the songs ... that was decent music ...
Kylies Stunt Arse said:Yes, but that is solely because that was the time you were listening to music a lot and paying attention. You've just said that for 15 years you haven't done that so it's not really surprising that you don't recognise anything recent.
looney said:Thats not the problem. Lack of UK talent reflects the lack of international success stories over the last 15 years.
I spoke to a 20 year old student who asked my favourite bands and I said one was Simple Minds, to which he said who? The problem is that youngsters dont listen to any older music so have little or nothing to compare to todays talent vacuum.
UK record sales in the US dropped from a third of the market to 2% in the 90's and that was mainly the beatles and spicegirls.
The prodigy were one hit wonders both sides but thats about it.
Kylies Stunt Arse said:Total and utter bollocks. Just because you have no interest in music from that time and hark back to the "golden age". Go stick some Beatles on and suck on your Werthers grandad.
Grendel said:You also had Ken Dodd at number one for 6 weeks in 1965.
Gully said:Most people who like 70's and 80's music probably listen to Radio 2, trapped in a little cocoon with Terry Wogan, they think that music nowadays is rubbish but are not best placed to comment as they so rarely hear any. There are some excellent acts around at the moment, the likes of: The Arctic Monkeys, Kaiser Chiefs, Kasabian, etc, etc, etc...
NMH said:KSA is right, music isn't just squeezed into the telephoto lens of nostalgia to make some distant decade remarkably better than the current time. Supergrass and Stereophonics have been rather good, Charlatans and Mondays and Carter made great stuff in the 90's. Porcupine Tree have made leaps and bounds from the mid-90's to now, Steve Malkmus last cd is good.
Today, Nine Black Alps and Duke Spirit are 'new' bands worth hearing.
Nirvana did NOT rip off Pearl Jam and Pixies as they were basically of the same period, and Pearl Jam are rubbish anyway., the bloke can NOT sing! The Screaming Trees and Faith No More are better bands from that era, they spank the crap out of P.Jam