Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Where is the plane that crashed into the Pentagon?



caz99

New member
Jun 2, 2004
1,895
Sompting
eastlondonseagull said:
True Caz. We're not very good ourselves, are we?!

defo not. south african politics too is horrendously corrupt. at least we can have the chance to vote without it being rigged
 






Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,863
Well if it was a missile what happened to the plane seen flying very low towards the Pentagon? Was it suddenly vaporised by aliens?
 


On the Left Wing

KIT NAPIER
Oct 9, 2003
7,094
Wolverhampton
Useful US Military Warnings

"Aim towards the Enemy." - Instruction printed on US Rocket Launcher


"When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not our friend." - U.S. Army


"Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate. The bombs are guaranteed to always hit the ground." - U.S.A.F.Ammo Troop


"If the enemy is in range, so are you." - Infantry Journal


"A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your unit." - Army's magazine of preventive maintenance.

"It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed." - U.S. Air Force Manual


"Try to look unimportant; they may be low on ammo." - Infantry Journal

Five-second fuses only last three seconds." - Infantry Journal


"Bravery is being the only one who knows you're afraid." - Col. David Hackworth


"If your attack is going too well, you're probably walking into an ambush." - Infantry Journal


"Any ship can be a minesweeper ... once." - Anon


(And lastly)

"If you see a bomb technician running, try to keep up with him." -- U.S.A. Ammo Troop
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
These days, you can never believe that what you are seeing is real, it's far too easy to add and remove images from a piece of video with a bit of creative 'touching up'

I agree in general though that we don't know the half of what actually went on. I'm not sure I want to either, it's probably better that we we remain ignorant
 




CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,092
"Try to look unimportant; they may be low on ammo." - Infantry Journal


Good advice if you ask me.
 


Albion Rob

New member
I haven't read the whole thread but I thought about 90 people died on the plane which allegedy hit the Pentagon?

How does that tally then? Did they just get loads of agents to pretend they had lost loved ones?

There must have been funerals and people must have attended? Ot ertr the same mourners at every funeral?

All very strange.
 


itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
On the Left Wing said:
"A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your unit." - Army's magazine of preventive maintenance.

:lolol:

I don't know why I found that as funny as I did
 








Ex Shelton Seagull

New member
Jul 7, 2003
1,522
Block G, Row F, Seat 175
Albion Rob said:
I haven't read the whole thread but I thought about 90 people died on the plane which allegedy hit the Pentagon?

How does that tally then? Did they just get loads of agents to pretend they had lost loved ones?

There must have been funerals and people must have attended? Ot ertr the same mourners at every funeral?

All very strange.

According to the theorists, they all live on an island somewhere or in Canada. They were all given new identities and brainwashed so they would forget their previous life. The pilots were crack CIA agents who flew the plane to a secret location where everyone was spirited away to the island (or Canada).

Don't laugh mate. Some people really believe that.
 








chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,313
Glorious Goodwood
On the Left Wing said:
Most SAM STS or ATA missiles have armour piercing noses hardened with depleted uranium, in order to pierce tank or battleship hulls ... therefore usually give a clean penetration

SAM - surface to air
ATA - air to air

Most missiles are not designed to hit their targetes, that would be a hitile (seriously) . OTLW, you are talking about armour piercing shells and the point of the uranium is that it maximizes energy transfer through the target, i.e. the tank wall. The intense heat and will pierce and spray the enclosed inside area with gas and molten metal. Most missiles certainly do not have hardened noses. :smokin:
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
i am not one to give much credibility to conspiracy theories, but its very clear to me that it was not a boeing 7whatever7 that hit the pentagon.

As the video says, plane crashes leave debris, and alot of it. There simply isnt the physical eviedence to suggest that a large commuter aircraft has hit the Pentagon. Where are the engines, the wings and the rear end of the plane? Why is there a hugh browned area of grass from the 100's galons of burning aviation fuel? you can do a lot with photoshop etc, but you can see clearly in those pictures that there are fire appliances in attendance soon after impact but that they dont show the sort of damage you'd expect for a large airplane. Have the images been edited? well if so, i have yet to see the authentic originals showing all that damage, which you'd expect on the offical/anti-conspiracy sites.

Also, i was at home that afternoon watching BBC News 24. The first reports of the pentagon strike where of a missle, private jet or a simple car bomb - they simply didnt know for the first hour or 2.

So what happened to Flight 77? well, the first theory i heard the following week (and before the mass 9/11 conspiracy engine had been started up) was that the plane had been shoot down on route, then a strike carried out to cover the fact that the US air force had shoot down a civilian aircraft. To my knowledge, they where no reported injuries or deaths amongst the pentagon staff, impling the building, or at least that section, had been cleared.
 
Last edited:


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
beorhthelm said:


So what happened to Flight 77? well, the first theory i heard the following week (and before the mass 9/11 conspiracy engine had been started up) was that the plane had been shoot down on route, then a strike carried out to cover the fact that the US air force had shoot down a civilian aircraft. To my knowledge, they where no reported injuries or deaths amongst the pentagon staff, impling the building, or at least that section, had been cleared.

Now that is a theory that would not be beyond the realms of possibilty. I LOVE conspiracy theories, even if 99% are later disproved.
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
That's very quick thinking and acting by the Air Force innit??

not really, they had an hour or so to make this decision. Probably the same fighter that shot down the boeing.

After two planes hit the wtc, Fighters are dispatched to intcept the other two aircraft that are known to be off course and under terrorist control. Fighter fires warning shot thats ignored. this aircraft is heading for washington and the target is therfore pretty clear. Given that they already know this is a hostile attack, someone has to make the call - White House or death of 70 odd passengers. Not going to be the white house is it... someone on the political side objects, and the solution is to suffer a smaller, controlled hit on the pentagon to cover the possible discomfort.

Maybe not. but look at the alternatives: either a boeing crashed into the pentagon and vapourised on contact, or else you believe in the hardcore conspiracy that the whole days events where preplanned and orchestrated - in which case why didnt they actually crash the plane and avoid this question mark?
 




CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,092
beorhthelm said:
not really, they had an hour or so to make this decision. Probably the same fighter that shot down the boeing.

After two planes hit the wtc, Fighters are dispatched to intcept the other two aircraft that are known to be off course and under terrorist control. Fighter fires warning shot thats ignored. this aircraft is heading for washington and the target is therfore pretty clear. Given that they already know this is a hostile attack, someone has to make the call - White House or death of 70 odd passengers. Not going to be the white house is it... someone on the political side objects, and the solution is to suffer a smaller, controlled hit on the pentagon to cover the possible discomfort.

Maybe not. but look at the alternatives: either a boeing crashed into the pentagon and vapourised on contact, or else you believe in the hardcore conspiracy that the whole days events where preplanned and orchestrated - in which case why didnt they actually crash the plane and avoid this question mark?

You spin an evil web, sir!!

I just don't know what to believe!!
 


Biscuit

Native Creative
Jul 8, 2003
22,319
Brighton
so the american government flew its own missle into the side of its own building to nick someone who is innocent.

why?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here