There's a few reasons - we set a midnight deadline so perhaps honour bound by that, plus Chelsea's approach is full of snidey, underhand, agent benefiting tactics that I'm sure we're not happy about.
[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Johnny RoastBeef
These aren't the players you're looking for.
- Jan 11, 2016
- 3,472
Liverpool should walk away and throw as much of that £111m as needed at Bayern Munich and try to sign Kimmich.
If they don't sign a decent DM before the deadline they're in for a tricky season.
He’s a human, not a house. If Caicedo can’t agree terms with Liverpool, then the bid becomes meaningless. The chances at this point of us wanting to keep him, given all the disruption he’s caused and his agents would clearly continue to cause, has got to be close to zero.
Nottseagull
Well-known member
I'm wondering how many other people have had Moises changed to Noises.Please press the like button if you've had this.
Vetinari
Active member
- Jan 22, 2023
- 30
£120m yes.....triple fracture NO! Horrible thought.Whatever has happened this summer it's not Caicedos fault.All he has done is be an amazing footballer and then been advised and courted by absolute bellends!
fataddick
Well-known member
Maybe you accept Chelsea's £115m and give Liverpool £4m of it to apologise?
fruitnveg
Well-known member
I wouldn't, but I can be a vindicitive prick at times.
If this agent is the cause of all the troubles, as rumour and common sense would seem to suggest; well, we already have a brilliant, record breaking offer accepted. Is it worth rewarding this outrageous behaviour for the sake of the value we bought Moises? I say no. If they don't make a truly earth-sharttering offer now, Chelsea can go hang.
Last edited:
He is a commodity the minute he signs that contract. In reality he has no say where he goes under strict interpretation!
Why should we apologise, that is down to Chelsea. They agreed to the Auction, then reneged!
In what way are we honour bound to Liverpool? We’ve simply given them permission to speak to a player we effectively ‘own’ and agreed the compensation. The rest is up to them.
There's time yet!!
But do they actually listen to what they are being told?
Probably in order to force a higher bid from Chelsea, on which they will get a bigger cut.
Sure, but we can’t force him to play to his best if he stays, particularly as the manager’s already made his feelings clear. No point watching his value diminish before the whole farce begins again in January.
I don’t want to worry anybody, but I’ve just passed the training ground and I’m sure I saw Gazza with a four pack and a fishing rod outside
If you set up an auction with rules, then the players, Bayen, Pool and Chelsea agreed with the terms set. You honour the auction. Your suggestion that we disrespect Liverpool (all the while the bid is live) is abysmal.
Johnny RoastBeef
These aren't the players you're looking for.
- Jan 11, 2016
- 3,472
So the agent manges to piss off us, Liverpool and Chelsea in the same transfer.
That's impressive.
brighton_tom
Well-known member
- Jul 23, 2008
- 5,525
The tweets are so consistently one sided that this whole saga has been proof of how the agent/club fed bias works with these ITK twitter twats… not that we didn’t already know it. It’s just so barefaced these days.
It wont diminish but his reputation will!
fataddick
Well-known member
Supposedly you held an auction with a fixed end time which they won. If you auction something on eBay and then refuse to send it to the winning bidder you will rightly get reported to eBay etc. You should at least pretend to send him to Anfield (mislabel the Evri parcel he's shipped in or something) before selling him to Chelsea.
Now if that is sarcasm it's acceptable this time..........
