Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)

Where is Moises going?


  • Total voters
    664








trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,955
Hove
Most transfer payments are spread over longer periods. 4 years for £100M probably isn’t outrageous
Maybe not but no reason why we have to accept it, just to help ease their FFP pain. If we’re going to replace a player of Caicedo’s calibre and strengthen, we need more than £25m up front.
 


Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
Maybe not but no reason why we have to accept it, just to help ease their FFP pain. If we’re going to replace a player of Caicedo’s calibre and strengthen, we need more than £25m up front.
But we would do the same on player that we buy. Split the fee over x amount of years. The next club do the same and on and on
 


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,289
Withdean area
Maybe not but no reason why we have to accept it, just to help ease their FFP pain. If we’re going to replace a player of Caicedo’s calibre and strengthen, we need more than £25m up front.

It’s normal that transfer fees are paid by instalments over several years. All clubs operate that way including us.

It’s completely unrelated to profit/loss or FFP calculations. It’s purely an internal cash flow matter.
 




trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,955
Hove
But we would do the same on player that we buy. Split the fee over x amount of years. The next club do the same and on and on
Yeah, true. Ok. Put another way, if we’re only getting £25m for the next year, how attractive is that compared to keeping him and potentially having a really good Europa League run and another exciting season domestically? I’m not saying we’d make an extra £25m if he stays - just that we’ve got an owner who will place a value on ‘glory’ too. Chances are we’d still sell Caicedo for a huge fee next summer. I’m sure he’ll go, but will be delighted if we squeeze Chelsea until the pips squeak.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,292
Back in Sussex
Maybe not but no reason why we have to accept it, just to help ease their FFP pain. If we’re going to replace a player of Caicedo’s calibre and strengthen, we need more than £25m up front.
Whether they pay 1p or £100m up front, it has absolutely no bearing on their FFP position.

When it comes to player purchases. FFP deals with the value of the asset acquired and how that asset is amortised.

How the clubs spread payment is simply cashflow and nothing to do with FFP.
 






Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,785
GOSBTS
Maybe not but no reason why we have to accept it, just to help ease their FFP pain. If we’re going to replace a player of Caicedo’s calibre and strengthen, we need more than £25m up front.
It’s has nothing to do with FFP. It’s just cash flow isn’t it ?
 


















Silverhatch

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
4,691
Preston Park
Whether they pay 1p or £100m up front, it has absolutely no bearing on their FFP position.

When it comes to player purchases. FFP deals with the value of the asset acquired and how that asset is amortised.

How the clubs spread payment is simply cashflow and nothing to do with FFP.
Yes, absolutely, but the apparently exorbitant wages are also factored in to the BIG club annual reporting. That’s why Chelsea are trying to drive DOWN weekly wages but guarantee huge contract length. They are not offering anyone at 21 £200k a week over 8 years.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,289
Withdean area
Prepare for the stages of grief.

IMG_4790.png
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here