Weststander
Well-known member
No, it started on 1 July 2023.
https://documents.uefa.com/r/UEFA-C...bility-Regulations-2023/F.1-Principles-Online
[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
No, it started on 1 July 2023.
https://documents.uefa.com/r/UEFA-C...bility-Regulations-2023/F.1-Principles-Online
NorthstandRacoon
Well-known member
Agree, he can f*** off if he goes. Clearly just going for the money if he goes to that scum club.
Would be a hoot if Caicedo told them, eight years? No chance, I don't want to be tied down for that long - 5 years and £50M will do me fine!
I've looked at your link, and ...................................
.............I'll take your word for it!
Weststander
Well-known member
UEFA laws effective 1July 23, you had to scroll down to section G.3.c.
“This is achieved by the systematic allocation of the cost of the asset as an expense from the date the player’s registration is acquired and over the period of the player’s contract, up to a maximum of 5 years”.
Mental Lental
Well-known member
Clive Walker
Stand Or Fall
“Triple my wages you say? Nah you’re alright!”
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,947
Although, even with the madness of the football market, his signature isn't worth that.
Having watched him this year, he has been very good, sometimes outstanding. In the odd match not so. I think we need to ask ourselves how we would view him if we supported another team.
I think Albion will get £80m. But if Chelsea stumped up £100m, making him top ten in the most expensive signings of all time, then they would be foolish. He's had one full season in this league. It's the second season that really defines a player.
Still, if they were willing I'm not complaining.
As regards Albion wanting at least £100m. Like almost everything I read, I'm taking that with the pinch of salt it deserves. We don't know what they would settle for.
True Brighton Lines. And like you say, if they pay it - I won't complain.
Garry Nelson's Left Foot
Well-known member
BREAKING NEWS
www.theguardian.com
Chelsea won't pay 100m for Caicedo. In other breaking news Brighton won't pay 100m for Mbappe.
People moan about Romano but Jacob Steinberg is continually hammering this absolute no new developments as news bollocks.
Chelsea refuse to meet Brighton’s demand of £100m for Moisés Caicedo
Chelsea intend to resist demands from Brighton that they pay £100m for midfielder Moisés Caicedo
www.theguardian.com
Chelsea won't pay 100m for Caicedo. In other breaking news Brighton won't pay 100m for Mbappe.
People moan about Romano but Jacob Steinberg is continually hammering this absolute no new developments as news bollocks.
Wow how ridiculously churlish, the guy does a massive job for us last season, agrees to a long term contract without an escape clause, which means he is no longer low hanging fruit, giving us the possibility of a massive pay day. All along with the owner and manager clearly knowing he has ambitions bigger than our club can in be reasonably expected to fulfil. Given all this then why not the same feelings for Mac, who did have an escape clause written in meaning, he was low hanging fruit and Liverpool got a bargain. Does your petulance extend to all players who move on? Why not have disdain for players who leave their clubs to come to us, surely they have behaved in the same manner. Should players only leave when their contracts are up or they are no longer wanted by their club?
phoenix
Well-known member
- May 18, 2009
- 2,871
If you sign a contract you should expect to stay for the duration unless of course you have a gentleman's agreement or likewise to say differently. which i would fully expect Brighton to honour.
We pay him handsomely to do a massive job. That's the point. I don't have a problem with Moises by the way i just want it all sorted so he can concentrate on football wherever that may be. Then we as a club can move on.
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
I was agreeing with you until you said on loan. Why would we drop a players value for a loan move? Makes no sense.
Staying for the length of your contract is the last thing we want our top players to do! Football doesn't work like that.
That’s Tony’s model absolutely fvcked then.
We could have another 8 weeks of this.
Not good.
Whilst I agree with your outcome prediction, there is the possibility that in 8 weeks time, Chelsea just pay us the £100m. A lot is riding on Colwill’s return from England duty. I suspect, like Mount, he has had enough of Chelsea. But they hold the cards. He may well sign an extension with them on the proviso that he comes back to us for a season.
