if it's the article I've just read it actually reads resigned to losing him IF the asking price is metAndy Naylor quoted in today's Athletic as saying Caicedo "is probably on his way to Chelsea"
if it's the article I've just read it actually reads resigned to losing him IF the asking price is metAndy Naylor quoted in today's Athletic as saying Caicedo "is probably on his way to Chelsea"
Not a great sign that he's joing up from equador. Surely we must be setting a deadline with Chelsea. This could fook the start of our season
Are you referring to this sentence from the Billy Gilmour article?Andy Naylor quoted in today's Athletic as saying Caicedo "is probably on his way to Chelsea"
I think it's the word 'probably' instead of 'possibly' that most of us are reading into - maybe reading too much into.Are you referring to this sentence from the Billy Gilmour article?
Gilmour is well-placed for more regular game time than last season; Mac Allister has been sold to Liverpool and Caicedo is probably on his way out as well to Chelsea, who are Brighton’s opening opponents in this weekend’s Premier League ‘Summer Series’.
The bit in bold 'Caicedo is probably on his way out as well to Chelsea' just links to an article about whether Caicedo would be a good fit for Chelsea's midfield. There's nothing in either article to suggest there's been any further development.
We are where we were yesterday, last week, last month. We all know he's probably going but nothing has happened yet to further that outcome. At least nothing mentioned in that article.
Is that a change in Naylor's reporting? Has he previously only used possibly? Genuine question, I've not been reading too much into his use of words.I think it's the word 'probably' instead of 'possibly' that most of us are reading into - maybe reading too much into.
Rest assured that if he is sold, it'll be for a price whereby BHA believe that they can make a net enhancement of the squad - ie losing Caicedo's ability in midfield but enhancing strength in other areas. Chelsea is a cash cow for us right now and is setting us up for years.
I have no idea, but I have had a tweet alert on for Naylor since the transfer window opened and this is the first time I've noticed this subtle use of language.Is that a change in Naylor's reporting? Has he previously only used possibly? Genuine question, I've not been reading too much into his use of words.
Yes, we will get a fantastic fee for Caicedo which will probably leave us, like you say, with a stronger team overall and possibly a nice little profit to boot.
Fair enough. He also says in one of the tweets posted earlier something along the lines of talks expected to advance so maybe it's becoming clearer that Chelsea are going to pay what they need to pay to get him.I have no idea, but I have had a tweet alert on for Naylor since the transfer window opened and this is the first time I've noticed this subtle use of language.
Not sure it’s subtle, think it’s more a case of over-analysis on here.I have no idea, but I have had a tweet alert on for Naylor since the transfer window opened and this is the first time I've noticed this subtle use of language.
He wouldn’t be back in the UK a week, we play our first game in the US against Chelsea on Saturday. He would likely be getting off a plane here and pretty much straight on one heading to the states. It makes much more sense for both him and Pervis to fly direct and join up with the squad in America given the very short turn around they’d have doing if any other way.I think it makes sense that these guys don’t fly back to the UK for a week, deal with the jet lag and then fly back out to America and deal with it again. More efficient to just do some fitness work together for the few days they are missing, then fly north and meet up with the players in the states.
Analysis? Strong word for talking a lot with barely any facts.Not sure it’s subtle, think it’s more a case of over-analysis on here.
Agreed - Caicedo has "probably" been going to Chelsea for many weeks. He knows it, the Albion hierarchy know it and Chelsea know it.Not sure it’s subtle, think it’s more a case of over-analysis on here.
Is there a claws in his contract to let him go cheap ? Like bizarre Mac fee.
Yep this is where I am. With Dahoud coming in, Glimour stepping up and reported interest in Kudos we seem to be very much planning for life without Moises. The £100 mill we get when it happens will be very sweet indeed and I fully trust De Zerbi to improve any player we have to the levels needed.Agreed - Caicedo has "probably" been going to Chelsea for many weeks. He knows it, the Albion hierarchy know it and Chelsea know it.
We're just going through the game of brinkmanship that is similar to when someone goes to look at a new car, clearly likes it but walks away telling the salesman that he is "going to think about it". Everyone knows he'll be back and a deal will be struck one way or another.
The Albion will have been planning for a life without Caicedo for some months now, and I can't imagine they've had any meaningful change in those thoughts. It might actually disrupt our overall plans more if he were to still be here when the transfer window SLAMS shut.
He was on a long contract so he either waited for albions valuation to be met whilst on a lower salary, or on a higher salary.MacAllister only had one year left when he signed, so a transfer clause was probably necessary to get the contract extension done. Caicedo, on the other hand, had a deal that ran unitl 2025, so it wouldn't have made much sense for BHA to have allowed a cheap release clause to be inluded when we'd already turned down 70m a month earlier.
Nevertheless, it'd be interesting to know what was in it for Caicedo to pursuade him (and his agent) to put pen to paper and commit to June 2027 (plus one-year option). I imagine it was as simple as being paid a shed load of £££, both in the short-term and for a guaranteed 4.5 years if he was unfortunate enough to suffer a career-hindering injury.
Surely he'll be off to Palace?More vultures would be circling if that was the case. FC Talon, perhaps.
You’re probably right. It’ll be interesting to see what that planning is, whether it be Colwill, another midfielder, or both. It can’t be a like for like replacement as players of Caicedo’s quality, at his age and within our budget are very few and far between.Agreed - Caicedo has "probably" been going to Chelsea for many weeks. He knows it, the Albion hierarchy know it and Chelsea know it.
We're just going through the game of brinkmanship that is similar to when someone goes to look at a new car, clearly likes it but walks away telling the salesman that he is "going to think about it". Everyone knows he'll be back and a deal will be struck one way or another.
The Albion will have been planning for a life without Caicedo for some months now, and I can't imagine they've had any meaningful change in those thoughts. It might actually disrupt our overall plans more if he were to still be here when the transfer window SLAMS shut.
Well yes, now…He wouldn’t be back in the UK a week, we play our first game in the US against Chelsea on Saturday. He would likely be getting off a plane here and pretty much straight on one heading to the states. It makes much more sense for both him and Pervis to fly direct and join up with the squad in America given the very short turn around they’d have doing if any other way.