Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)

Where is Moises going?


  • Total voters
    664


Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
12,212
So, if they were breaking even before buying a player, and then spent 105m on a player, they would be making a 105m loss then?

P.S. You can't send me to the stupid corner as well, as I'm already there (I said Nunez was anonymous when he wasn't actually on the pitch).
No because that isn't how FFP works. A £105 million pound transfer fee is amortised at £21 million per year over 5 years in the accounts (it would be a higher amount and over a shorter number of years if the contract is less than 5 years). It isn't all added to the accounts in one go.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,724
Faversham
Let's see. Chelsea will 10000% finish higher than 12th with a new manager and young squad. Will Liverpool finish above 5th ...?

Chelsea looked the better team today and had a stronger bench .
Mahogany?
 










US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,813
Cleveland, OH
No because that isn't how FFP works. A £105 million pound transfer fee is amortised at £21 million per year over 5 years in the accounts (it would be a higher amount and over a shorter number of years if the contract is less than 5 years). It isn't all added to the accounts in one go.
The rules regarding FFP are weird and counterintuitive. For example, if a team sold a player for $100m and bought a player in the same window for $100m on a 5 year contract, your intuition would say they broke even. But they didn't. Due to amortization, they actually made an $80m profit this year. Because the rest of the fee will be spread out over the next four years.

Where this gets really interesting is with player swaps. And this is what got Juventus in trouble. Because with a straight swap you can just invent whatever value you want and claim to have just had a huge profit!
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,621
Goldstone
I go to a gallery/theatre/museum at least once a week.

I wouldn't say you are typical.


I go to restaurants that you wouldn't find in any provincial town at least once a fortnight.

I said yes to restaurants.

As for brightest minds congregating in certain cities this is just a known fact. Take the front office of an investment bank for example, you have some of the smartest graduates from all over the world move to London. Same for any major industry and the people tend to stick around.
I didn't dispute the claim that the brightest minds are there, I asked what difference it made, and if they stop you in the street for a chat. Whilst some of the brightest minds in the world might be in London, you're clearly not one of them.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,621
Goldstone
So, if they were breaking even before buying a player, and then spent 105m on a player, they would be making a 105m loss then?

Only if the player had a salary of zero, and a contract of 1 year.


P.S. You can't send me to the stupid corner as well, as I'm already there (I said Nunez was anonymous when he wasn't actually on the pitch).
Yeah I saw that :D
 




dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,315
London
I wouldn't say you are typical.




I said yes to restaurants.


I didn't dispute the claim that the brightest minds are there, I asked what difference it made, and if they stop you in the street for a chat. Whilst some of the brightest minds in the world might be in London, you're clearly not one of them.
So you pretty much agree with everything I'm saying. I'm not sure what your angle is in this conversation anyway ! You jumped on someone else's comment, and my reply to that....

Most people do it for business reasons. Not lifestyle . (Live in London)

Is this something you believe yourself? Is this something you strongly believe?

Why are you so triggered with me stating that London has better restaurants , culture and more equadorians than the rest of the country, that would clearly make it more attractive to a young guy like Moises.
 






Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,451
Oxton, Birkenhead
So you pretty much agree with everything I'm saying. I'm not sure what your angle is in this conversation anyway ! You jumped on someone else's comment, and my reply to that....

Most people do it for business reasons. Not lifestyle . (Live in London)

Is this something you believe yourself? Is this something you strongly believe?

Why are you so triggered with me stating that London has better restaurants , culture and more equadorians than the rest of the country, that would clearly make it more attractive to a young guy like Moises.
I thought you said models not Ecuadorians ? To be serious for a moment I also think that people mainly live in London for business reasons ie to be near a high paid job. I did it myself for years. I also interviewed a lot of these ‘brightest minds’ that turned up at investment banks you mentioned. The quality of these minds declined massively with the rise of films about traders, to the extent that the majority were get rich quick spivs. I am sure there are some great minds in London but they don’t congregate in investment banks.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,040
Pattknull med Haksprut
The rules regarding FFP are weird and counterintuitive. For example, if a team sold a player for $100m and bought a player in the same window for $100m on a 5 year contract, your intuition would say they broke even. But they didn't. Due to amortization, they actually made an $80m profit this year. Because the rest of the fee will be spread out over the next four years.

Where this gets really interesting is with player swaps. And this is what got Juventus in trouble. Because with a straight swap you can just invent whatever value you want and claim to have just had a huge profit!
That’s not correct. Would only make an £80m profit if the player was from the academy or acquired via a Bosman. Profit is calculated as sales price less book value, which itself is original purchase price less accumulated amortisation.
 






Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,793
at home
Has he fecked off to russiantheivedroublesski yet?
 








dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,315
London
I thought you said models not Ecuadorians ? To be serious for a moment I also think that people mainly live in London for business reasons ie to be near a high paid job. I did it myself for years. I also interviewed a lot of these ‘brightest minds’ that turned up at investment banks you mentioned. The quality of these minds declined massively with the rise of films about traders, to the extent that the majority were get rich quick spivs. I am sure there are some great minds in London but they don’t congregate in investment banks.
Equadorians / models and equadorian models ... All of these ;)

Conversation is getting really nuanced now. But come on are you denying that Goldman's / JPM /top PE firms or more so these days; the large tech companies in London don't hire from the top of the class from Insead/Cambridge/Oxford/Harvard etc ? And these kids are not drawn to the bright lights of London?
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,653
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
This is an argument for another thread but that's clearly nonsense. Like NYC , successful people like to live in London because it has some of the top museums, galleries, restaurants, bars etc and some of the brightest minds in the world.

It's certainly on a downward trajectory at the moment but it's still one of the most important cities in the world and pretty much props up the rest of the country.

IMHO of course
Overpriced property and stabbings every five minutes. No wonder Brighton has so many DFLs.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here