Tokyohands
Well-known member
21.6 which is fine. I've lost 9 kgs in the last 2 years but drink a lot and eat a lot, the difference I made was to cycle the 26 km round trip to work each day and feel awesome for it.
Last edited:
Remember this is the system that labelled Jessica Ennis as overweight just before the London Olympics. An utterly unrealistic system and probably does more damage than it does good.
Cor, imagine what she could have achieved if she had been healthy and in shape...
Cor, imagine what she could have achieved if she had been healthy and in shape...
Indeed .... surely a fatty could never win a gold ! Besides, the far better measurement is would you ? And in Ms Ennis's case yes I would.
BMI 25 overweight. BMI of 24.9 = healthy weight.
I find it amusing that he uses an Olympic gold medalist to prove his idea it’s “utterly unrealistic”.
I mean, how “realistic” does one expect your height and weight to be as an all encompassing measurement of ones health? Im baffled anyone can believe it’s anything more that what it is. Come on, think about it instead of getting all angry.....please.
Yeah, so is mine - it's big and it doesn't move.My body is a temple.
Schools believe it enough to write to parents.
I also have an autoimmune disease and Hashimotos disease which affects my metabolism. I do eat healthily but have to be more careful than most as I can put weight on just by eating normally.
Ditto! - 27.8 here, not bad but not where I want to be, I have Graves which caused me to lose so much weight, they tried to balance me but ended up having RAI, so went Hypothyroid rather than Hyperthyroid. Does not seem to matter what I do, I exercise plenty and eat sensibly, but the extra weight will not shift off.
As an aside what are your views about checking your bollocks for lumps? I mean, this isn’t a scientific way to determine you have testicular cancer is it? It’s “utterly unrealistic” etc etc and could just be a boil. Same with breasts. Should we dispense with both of these as well as BMI?
the trouble with BMI is that if you tick over 0.1 from "healthy" to "overweight", you are told you are going to die from all manner of health conditions. anyone likely to have significant health problems based on weight (rather than the myriad of other ones) is of a size thats quite obviously bit too large. its a useful tool for clinicians and statisticians to put us into categories but probably shouldnt be used for any sort of medical advice on its own.
and on the subject of stats, did anyone else note the post code required? massive data harvesting there.
and on the subject of stats, did anyone else note the post code required? massive data harvesting there.
What dastardly deeds are they going to do with this data? Find out where the most fat people are and target them with more Turkey Twizzler ads?