So why was he shouting at them to go forward for basically the whole 2nd half?
Didn’t see that but if he did.. why didn’t the players do it? lol robably because they know the drill...go 1 up and DEFEND.. every game! We have no bollocks
So why was he shouting at them to go forward for basically the whole 2nd half?
So why was he shouting at them to go forward for basically the whole 2nd half?
Didn’t see that but if he did.. why didn’t the players do it? lol robably because they know the drill...go 1 up and DEFEND.. every game! We have no bollocks
Disgraceful cheating, bringing on a sub after only 56 minutes. Absolutely underhand tactics. I'm so pleased and proud my club doesn't think it appropriate to stoop to such levels.I think it was more to do with Vardy coming on in the 56 th minute. He changed the game, without him, they had less ambition than us, with him, they looked a very good side.
Wow! Can't believe the number of people saying it was all Hughton's fault. Thankfully as some have noted he was going mental beckoning them to push up. Also astutely mentioned in a previous post was our rubbish attempt to play ' keep ball' which from from where I was in WSU was met with tongue in cheek 'olays'.
For me this was down to the players.
No idea why they didn't but Hughton was constantly telling them to push forward throughout the 2nd half.
What was the half time team talk?
I'd love to know because we made a mess of the kick off and then allowed Leicester to look like they were the team with an extra player.
TBF, perhaps it was more to do with what Puel said to his side at half time because Leicester pressed far higher and with much more urgency after the break, we certainly didn't look like we expected that. We tried to play keep ball at times, probably a good tactic if you can do it, sadly, once again, we were yet again unable to against a team that is prepared to work hard and close down the space.
Its a lesson we need to learn quickly because Huddersfield, Palace and Burnley will all play this way against us and if recent examples are anything to go by, will all be 3 points closer to us by the end of the respective games.
Im no coach, but it seems to me that if you have pacey wingers that are allowed to play as wingers, a simple ball over the top for them to chase, is an effective way out of the high press, no good to us of course, because we would have to have afforementioned wingers.
Oh well, i guess we can always pass our way out of trouble, gotta come good at some point, right?
CH waving the players forward most of the second half suggesting what he was seeing was not what he’d instructed. Players played poorly second half, Leicester transformed and took risks. Players need to have a look at themselves 2nd half, only so much a manager can say or do.
Maybe, Leicester have better attacking players than us, being as their squad is far more expensive in fees and wages than we have got at the moment.
I tend to think some on here are still using our Championship form as a guide to how we should be playing, and how we should be getting similar results. We were a very good Championship team, exceptional even, but, we are a lower half Premier League team, and, we are still punching above our weight.
I would have thought only 2 teams have spent less than us, and, pay lower wages, we are going to have more disappointing games than satisfactory ones, ‘‘tis the way of a lower Prem side, but, we won’t be hammered by any team, and we should be good enough to stay up, and that, at the moment, is our priority.
Hughton's interview said it all. Lets start with "There a very good side" Chris if we played the ****ing dead eleven from the local morgue they'd be a "very good side".
****ing stop negative ****ing tactics when we are in control, its doing my ****ing head in.
Because we have a mentally arthritic manager who would rather protect a one nil lead than go looking for a second and third goal. One nil is always enough, except for when it isn't.