Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #21
I understand the outcry about human life, likewise I don't understand the attitude of " there only ancient ruins who gives a fck ? "
You don't "raise something to the ground" Gareth. You raise something from the ground and raze something too it. Tsk.
The logic concerning Assad on NSC earlier in this war was to bomb the **** out of him...now people worrying about ruins
Or even 'to it'. Tsk indeed.
Be sad.
Or, the US bomb one of their holy cities? (Controversial)
Mecca?
You don't "raise something to the ground" Gareth. You raise something from the ground and raze something too it. Tsk.
A quick way to ensure WW3 kicks off in our lifetime.
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!Not from me, I always thought the West encouraging uprisings doesn't make sense because it condones and glorifies killing. It teaches people that it is ok to kill for what they believe in. Had we not supported the idea of toppling of Assad there wouldn't have been a war against IS in Syria to choose not to help in, and we would have avoided all this mess.
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!
I said something similar in a thread on here a year or so ago (when Syria started kicking off) - and some knobhead accused me of being a Daily Mail reader!
Exactly.I was working in Saudi for a bit in 2002. Very strong view from the locals there was that they hated Saddam and a lot of what he did, but accepted he had the region by the balls, preventing the extremists rising and that taking him and his regime out would instantly destabilise the whole region.
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!
I said something similar in a thread on here a year or so ago (when Syria started kicking off) - and some knobhead accused me of being a Daily Mail reader!
Pretty much agree with that. Saddam Hussein, Colonel Gaddafi and Assad all were / are pretty nasty pieces of work, but the west's actions have lead, or at the very least contributed, to the present alarming rise in extremist Islam - be careful what you wish for!
Islamic State was born from al-Qaida in Iraq, who are Saddam's ex officers, generals and army. They are running this campaign.
Of course human life is more important than a pile of ruins.
But it does grate that ISIS are trying to destroy culture and history. Reminds me of the Nazis "Burning Books".
Its seems incredible that an organisation can get so wound up about some ruins in the sands. Shall we go and blow up Stonehenge perhaps?
ISIS seem to want a very pure form of Islam. Except for mobile phones, Facebook and YourTube of course.
With respect Uncle Spielberg.As this would be a horror against the whole of Humanity. It is site of immense beauty and importance but before it was built before the days of their God, it is a falsehood. I fear this is only a matter of time and it will be utterly heart breaking, religious or not.
If/When this happens and we see it posted on youtube being smashed down and blown up, what should or could the World do ?
Friday debate